19740426 1 |
Previous | 1 of 24 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
the ·Louisville Cardinal Vol. XLV No. 28 Room 117, Otter ~1, Louisville, Ky. 40208 Your cheatin' heart has told on you Cheating is widespread among undergraduate students by Jim McGovern A vast majority of University of Louisville senior college students cheat, and most do so with little fear of getting caught. Although most students disapprove of cheating and feel it contradicts their educational goals, over three-fourths of the students asked, responded that they had cheated at least once during tbeir college careers. These are just a few of the findings documented in a senior thesis submitted to the Sociology Department in the fall semester of 1972. Written by Rita lmpellizzeri, the paper is entitled "Cheating Behavior among Senior College Students at the University of Louisville." Using a randomly administered questionnaire submitted to 100 senior college undergraduate students enrolled in the School of Business and the College of Arts and Sciences, Impellizzeri concludes that students resort to cheating because they reject institutionalized means of attaining institutionalized goals, and because they perceive a low level of peer disapproval of cheating behavior. She points out that there is a significant contradiction between attitudes and behavior among the students sampled. For instance, according to the data presented, 76 percent of the respondents agreed that "cheating seems to contradict what you are in school for." But 81 percent of those same students admit to cheating in one way or another some time during their college careers. The writer concludes that "whether or not to cheat is apparently decided by each individual according to the situation. "From all indications, it seems that the students actually believe and hole 'normal' values. It is only under pressure that they break with these values and act in the opposite way. In other words, it seems that cheating behavior is more of a reaction on their part." In addition to her own work , Impellizzeri cites the findings of a variety CAN YOU TAtTOO ANSWERS UNO£R EYt:L\DS 7.. - ---c-up of other researchers as supportive of her conclusions. Although she admits that research in the area has been minimal, she references a study which reported that 37 percent of the students polled at 10 different universities admitted cheating by copying another's work or by using crib sheets on examinations . . Another researcher found that half the students polled at 99 colleges' across the country also admitted cheating on exams and plagiarizing in one form or another. Other studies have indicated that the incidence of cheating is higher among fraternity and sorority members than among independents; that students who cheat 'tend to be "lenient in all their attitudes, to be less motivated academically, have fewer artistic or literary interests , and come from lower socio-economic backgrounds than non-cheaters." In addition, it has been reported that cheating occurs more frequently among juniors and seniors, among students with lower-than-average grades, and among males more than females. In her own research, Impellizzeri found that: • TI1e student who cheats can look around him and "perceive quite truthfully that he is part of the group - 'Everybody does it, nobody thinks it is really wrong."' • Of the 100 students polled, 81 had cheated in one way or another, and had committed each of eleven specific acts of cheating in the following percentages: Percent Specific Acts of Sample Padding a few items on bibliography. 33 Copying a few sentences of material without footnoting it in the paper. 42 Writing a paper for another student. 19 Getting questions or answers from someone who already has taken the same exam. 55 Giving answers to students during an exam. 44 Arranging with other students to . give or receive answers by use of signals. 5 Arranging to sit with someone who will allow you to copy from his or her exam. 24 Copying from someone 's test or exam without he or she realizing it. 31 Copying from someone 's test or exam with that person's knowledge. 28 Taking an exam for another student. 4 Having another student take an exam for you. • Cheating occurs more often on tests and examinations than on papers. • However, three quarters of the respondents felt that cheating on a paper is a lesser offense than cheating on a test or exam. • "The majority don't feel that their decision not to cheat is based on a fear of April 26, 1974 getting cuahgt, but rather this decision is based on 'an inner loss f self respect."' • Although the majority of students condenm cheating, ·nearly one fourth of those polled "reflected a condoning attitude in their respon es.'' • Contrary to popular stereotyping, females do not cheat less than males. • Those students with medium to lower grades are more apt to cheat. However, the rate of cheating is well above 50 percent no matter what the grade point average, except for the lowest category (C- or lower) in which the rate of cheating was negligible. • Fifty percent of the students agreed that "'faculty members don't seem to try very hard to catch cheaters,' and that after cheaters are caught, faculty members 'show little uniformity in handling cases of cheating.'" • Over 50 percent of the students felt those who -cheat and plagiarize do so frequently. • Almost 75 percent of those polled believed that cheaters do not get caught. • Approximately 75 percent of the respondents said they sometimes feel that cheaters hurt the chances of others for a better grade. • Only about half the group had ever read the university's policy on cheating in he undergraduate catalog. • Half the students who answered felt they would not necessarily like to see the administration and faculty "get tougher" with cheaters. Sociology professor John H. Rieger, who supervised the thesis , feels that "except for some matters of sampling which really don't effect the results at all, it's a good student paper and probably is wuite close to 'the way it is.'" Rieger pointed out that 'interestingly enough, the paper was a result of my mention of a previous incident to my 400 (senior thesis) class. I had been presented the previous semester a thesis which 1 contained an entire chapter from a published work. When I ranted and raved about the incident in the 400 class, Rita decided that the subject of cheating on this campus would make good material for her own thesis."
Object Description
Title | The Louisville Cardinal, April 26, 1974. |
Volume | XLV |
Issue | 28 |
Description | The University of Louisville’s undergraduate newspaper. The title of this publication has varied over the years, but with the exception of the period 1928-1930, when it was known as the U. of L. News, the title has always been a variation of The Cardinal. |
Subject |
Newspapers College student newspapers and periodicals University of Louisville--Students--Periodicals |
Date Original | 1974-04-26 |
Object Type | Newspapers |
Source | Scanned from microfilm in the Louisville Cardinal newspapers collection. Item Number ULUA Cardinal 19740426 |
Citation Information | See https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/description/collection/cardinal#conditions for guidance on citing this item. To cite the digital version, add its Reference URL (found by following the link in the header above the digital file) |
Collection | Louisville Cardinal Newspapers Collection |
Collection Website | https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/cardinal |
Digital Publisher | University of Louisville Archives and Special Collections |
Date Digital | 2019-01-29 |
Format | application/pdf |
Ordering Information | To inquire about reproductions, permissions, or for information about prices see: http://library.louisville.edu/archives/order. Please cite the Image Number when ordering. |
Image Number | ULUA Cardinal 19740426 |
Rating |
Description
Title | 19740426 1 |
Full Text | the ·Louisville Cardinal Vol. XLV No. 28 Room 117, Otter ~1, Louisville, Ky. 40208 Your cheatin' heart has told on you Cheating is widespread among undergraduate students by Jim McGovern A vast majority of University of Louisville senior college students cheat, and most do so with little fear of getting caught. Although most students disapprove of cheating and feel it contradicts their educational goals, over three-fourths of the students asked, responded that they had cheated at least once during tbeir college careers. These are just a few of the findings documented in a senior thesis submitted to the Sociology Department in the fall semester of 1972. Written by Rita lmpellizzeri, the paper is entitled "Cheating Behavior among Senior College Students at the University of Louisville." Using a randomly administered questionnaire submitted to 100 senior college undergraduate students enrolled in the School of Business and the College of Arts and Sciences, Impellizzeri concludes that students resort to cheating because they reject institutionalized means of attaining institutionalized goals, and because they perceive a low level of peer disapproval of cheating behavior. She points out that there is a significant contradiction between attitudes and behavior among the students sampled. For instance, according to the data presented, 76 percent of the respondents agreed that "cheating seems to contradict what you are in school for." But 81 percent of those same students admit to cheating in one way or another some time during their college careers. The writer concludes that "whether or not to cheat is apparently decided by each individual according to the situation. "From all indications, it seems that the students actually believe and hole 'normal' values. It is only under pressure that they break with these values and act in the opposite way. In other words, it seems that cheating behavior is more of a reaction on their part." In addition to her own work , Impellizzeri cites the findings of a variety CAN YOU TAtTOO ANSWERS UNO£R EYt:L\DS 7.. - ---c-up of other researchers as supportive of her conclusions. Although she admits that research in the area has been minimal, she references a study which reported that 37 percent of the students polled at 10 different universities admitted cheating by copying another's work or by using crib sheets on examinations . . Another researcher found that half the students polled at 99 colleges' across the country also admitted cheating on exams and plagiarizing in one form or another. Other studies have indicated that the incidence of cheating is higher among fraternity and sorority members than among independents; that students who cheat 'tend to be "lenient in all their attitudes, to be less motivated academically, have fewer artistic or literary interests , and come from lower socio-economic backgrounds than non-cheaters." In addition, it has been reported that cheating occurs more frequently among juniors and seniors, among students with lower-than-average grades, and among males more than females. In her own research, Impellizzeri found that: • TI1e student who cheats can look around him and "perceive quite truthfully that he is part of the group - 'Everybody does it, nobody thinks it is really wrong."' • Of the 100 students polled, 81 had cheated in one way or another, and had committed each of eleven specific acts of cheating in the following percentages: Percent Specific Acts of Sample Padding a few items on bibliography. 33 Copying a few sentences of material without footnoting it in the paper. 42 Writing a paper for another student. 19 Getting questions or answers from someone who already has taken the same exam. 55 Giving answers to students during an exam. 44 Arranging with other students to . give or receive answers by use of signals. 5 Arranging to sit with someone who will allow you to copy from his or her exam. 24 Copying from someone 's test or exam without he or she realizing it. 31 Copying from someone 's test or exam with that person's knowledge. 28 Taking an exam for another student. 4 Having another student take an exam for you. • Cheating occurs more often on tests and examinations than on papers. • However, three quarters of the respondents felt that cheating on a paper is a lesser offense than cheating on a test or exam. • "The majority don't feel that their decision not to cheat is based on a fear of April 26, 1974 getting cuahgt, but rather this decision is based on 'an inner loss f self respect."' • Although the majority of students condenm cheating, ·nearly one fourth of those polled "reflected a condoning attitude in their respon es.'' • Contrary to popular stereotyping, females do not cheat less than males. • Those students with medium to lower grades are more apt to cheat. However, the rate of cheating is well above 50 percent no matter what the grade point average, except for the lowest category (C- or lower) in which the rate of cheating was negligible. • Fifty percent of the students agreed that "'faculty members don't seem to try very hard to catch cheaters,' and that after cheaters are caught, faculty members 'show little uniformity in handling cases of cheating.'" • Over 50 percent of the students felt those who -cheat and plagiarize do so frequently. • Almost 75 percent of those polled believed that cheaters do not get caught. • Approximately 75 percent of the respondents said they sometimes feel that cheaters hurt the chances of others for a better grade. • Only about half the group had ever read the university's policy on cheating in he undergraduate catalog. • Half the students who answered felt they would not necessarily like to see the administration and faculty "get tougher" with cheaters. Sociology professor John H. Rieger, who supervised the thesis , feels that "except for some matters of sampling which really don't effect the results at all, it's a good student paper and probably is wuite close to 'the way it is.'" Rieger pointed out that 'interestingly enough, the paper was a result of my mention of a previous incident to my 400 (senior thesis) class. I had been presented the previous semester a thesis which 1 contained an entire chapter from a published work. When I ranted and raved about the incident in the 400 class, Rita decided that the subject of cheating on this campus would make good material for her own thesis." |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for 19740426 1