19741018 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
the Louisville Cardinal Vol. XL VI No.8 Room 117, Otter Hall, Louisville, Ky. 40208 October 18, 1974 . Senate rescinds motiori on Miller's task force by Kenny Vandevelde The University Student Senate voted unanimously Tuesday night to rescind its motion of the previous week which "condemned, President Miller's proposed task force on student affairs as an usurpation of Senate authority. The motion to rescind was made by Senator Jim Kleinert, who has also made the original motion to condemn the task force. The Senate next voted un1ulimously to send to Miller a letter written by Senate President Greg Price and a proposal by Senator Ian Sonego relating to the task force. The letter said the ,motion of condemnation was passed "under a cloud of uncertainty" and that "unfortunately, as a result of past decisions regarding students, the Senate appeared defensive in its response." The recommendations sent to Miller ·by the Senate Tuesday contained the following scientific points: -. Students on the task force would be selected by the Student Senate, • An effort should be made "to complement not duplicate" the Senate's activities in certain areas, • The report of the task force should be sent to the Senate before any fmal decision is made. These suggestions attempted to meet objections raised by Senators that the task force should have its student . members elected entirely by the Senate without involvement by Miller's office and that the Senate should have fmal authority over student aff~. The Senate also passed two sets of recommendations drafted by Senate committees, one concerned with health and the other with athletics. The recommendations on health Photoan&* by Gtady Throneberry Director of Academic Senices W. Gary Morrilon told the AAS Student Council earlier this week that students 1ftre beiDa denied access to certain unitenity files on them. passed 24-2. They urged that "the level of services provided by campus health should be equivalent to that of a general medical practice." The recommendation also said, "The fee for Health Services should be separately indicated on the student's bill as a 'Health Service Fee.' The fee charged should be mandatory for all in he University. The fee charged should not exceed $3 per semester, and should be charged at the same rate to everyone, regardless of full-time or part-time status." The second of the two sets of recommendations dealt with the student athletic fee. One third of the mandatory student fee levied this year on all students was allocated to .athletics. The Senate called on the University to clearly label the athletic fee as such and to make it optional. Payment of the fee should entitle the student to free admission to all athletic events. The Senate also recommended that the current fee ($10 per year) be set as the maximum and that the same fee be charged to all students, part-time and full-time, who wished to pay an athletic fee. (Currently, part-time students pay a fee pro-rated according to the number of hours they are taking.) The recommendations on the athletic fee passed 20-2. In other action, the Senate, by a vote of 17 to 7, passed a resolution offered by Senator Debbie Kent that declared "support of the mass transit referendum be voted on November 5, 1974" and urged all students to vote for it. The Senate resolution cited the need for efficient and extensive mass transit and for lessened traffic congestion as reasons for supporting the ref~rendum. Photog~aph by Carl Maupin One U of L student found that the be• way to cope with the pressure of mid-tenn exams was to enjoy a few relaxed moments of autumn football. Students -denied access to university .files on themselves by Tom. Louderback Associate, Registrar Betty S. Bradford admitted at an A&S Student Council meeting· last Monday that students are not currently pennitted to inspect their own uconfidential files." Those files are maintained by the Registrar and contain any subjective comments and school records received by the University from other institutions including high schools. However, other records of a student's progress at U of L, including grades and grade point averages. are made available upon requst. A federal personal records disclosure law, effective November 21, will require the University to disclose the contents of all stude~nt records to the respective students upon their request. Mrs. Bradford and Gary Morrison, Director of Academic Services, addressed the A&S Student Council in response to a Council investigation of student records policies. . Mr. Morrison explained why the dual records have been maintained by the Registrar's Office. The "confidential flies" have been withheld from students in accordance with a state law while another set of records containing grades earned at U of L have been made available. The purpose of the law, according to Morrison , was to protect administrators or instructors who were required to make comments on a student's records. Conti n uing, he added that the University does not make or request subjective comments about its students, although such comments are received unsolicited from other institutions, especially high schools. He maintained that subjective comments have no bearing on any studenfs admission to the university during a "non-<:ompetitive situation." He describes the current situation as being "non-competitive." When the new federal law becomes effective, the dual system will be maintained but, in accordance with the (Continued on page 2)
Object Description
Title | The Louisville Cardinal, October 18, 1974. |
Volume | XLVI |
Issue | 8 |
Description | The University of Louisville’s undergraduate newspaper. The title of this publication has varied over the years, but with the exception of the period 1928-1930, when it was known as the U. of L. News, the title has always been a variation of The Cardinal. |
Subject |
Newspapers College student newspapers and periodicals University of Louisville--Students--Periodicals |
Date Original | 1974-10-18 |
Object Type | Newspapers |
Source | Scanned from microfilm in the Louisville Cardinal newspapers collection. Item Number ULUA Cardinal 19741018 |
Citation Information | See https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/description/collection/cardinal#conditions for guidance on citing this item. To cite the digital version, add its Reference URL (found by following the link in the header above the digital file) |
Collection | Louisville Cardinal Newspapers Collection |
Collection Website | https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/cardinal |
Digital Publisher | University of Louisville Archives and Special Collections |
Date Digital | 2019-01-29 |
Format | application/pdf |
Ordering Information | To inquire about reproductions, permissions, or for information about prices see: http://library.louisville.edu/archives/order. Please cite the Image Number when ordering. |
Image Number | ULUA Cardinal 19741018 |
Rating |
Description
Title | 19741018 1 |
Full Text | the Louisville Cardinal Vol. XL VI No.8 Room 117, Otter Hall, Louisville, Ky. 40208 October 18, 1974 . Senate rescinds motiori on Miller's task force by Kenny Vandevelde The University Student Senate voted unanimously Tuesday night to rescind its motion of the previous week which "condemned, President Miller's proposed task force on student affairs as an usurpation of Senate authority. The motion to rescind was made by Senator Jim Kleinert, who has also made the original motion to condemn the task force. The Senate next voted un1ulimously to send to Miller a letter written by Senate President Greg Price and a proposal by Senator Ian Sonego relating to the task force. The letter said the ,motion of condemnation was passed "under a cloud of uncertainty" and that "unfortunately, as a result of past decisions regarding students, the Senate appeared defensive in its response." The recommendations sent to Miller ·by the Senate Tuesday contained the following scientific points: -. Students on the task force would be selected by the Student Senate, • An effort should be made "to complement not duplicate" the Senate's activities in certain areas, • The report of the task force should be sent to the Senate before any fmal decision is made. These suggestions attempted to meet objections raised by Senators that the task force should have its student . members elected entirely by the Senate without involvement by Miller's office and that the Senate should have fmal authority over student aff~. The Senate also passed two sets of recommendations drafted by Senate committees, one concerned with health and the other with athletics. The recommendations on health Photoan&* by Gtady Throneberry Director of Academic Senices W. Gary Morrilon told the AAS Student Council earlier this week that students 1ftre beiDa denied access to certain unitenity files on them. passed 24-2. They urged that "the level of services provided by campus health should be equivalent to that of a general medical practice." The recommendation also said, "The fee for Health Services should be separately indicated on the student's bill as a 'Health Service Fee.' The fee charged should be mandatory for all in he University. The fee charged should not exceed $3 per semester, and should be charged at the same rate to everyone, regardless of full-time or part-time status." The second of the two sets of recommendations dealt with the student athletic fee. One third of the mandatory student fee levied this year on all students was allocated to .athletics. The Senate called on the University to clearly label the athletic fee as such and to make it optional. Payment of the fee should entitle the student to free admission to all athletic events. The Senate also recommended that the current fee ($10 per year) be set as the maximum and that the same fee be charged to all students, part-time and full-time, who wished to pay an athletic fee. (Currently, part-time students pay a fee pro-rated according to the number of hours they are taking.) The recommendations on the athletic fee passed 20-2. In other action, the Senate, by a vote of 17 to 7, passed a resolution offered by Senator Debbie Kent that declared "support of the mass transit referendum be voted on November 5, 1974" and urged all students to vote for it. The Senate resolution cited the need for efficient and extensive mass transit and for lessened traffic congestion as reasons for supporting the ref~rendum. Photog~aph by Carl Maupin One U of L student found that the be• way to cope with the pressure of mid-tenn exams was to enjoy a few relaxed moments of autumn football. Students -denied access to university .files on themselves by Tom. Louderback Associate, Registrar Betty S. Bradford admitted at an A&S Student Council meeting· last Monday that students are not currently pennitted to inspect their own uconfidential files." Those files are maintained by the Registrar and contain any subjective comments and school records received by the University from other institutions including high schools. However, other records of a student's progress at U of L, including grades and grade point averages. are made available upon requst. A federal personal records disclosure law, effective November 21, will require the University to disclose the contents of all stude~nt records to the respective students upon their request. Mrs. Bradford and Gary Morrison, Director of Academic Services, addressed the A&S Student Council in response to a Council investigation of student records policies. . Mr. Morrison explained why the dual records have been maintained by the Registrar's Office. The "confidential flies" have been withheld from students in accordance with a state law while another set of records containing grades earned at U of L have been made available. The purpose of the law, according to Morrison , was to protect administrators or instructors who were required to make comments on a student's records. Conti n uing, he added that the University does not make or request subjective comments about its students, although such comments are received unsolicited from other institutions, especially high schools. He maintained that subjective comments have no bearing on any studenfs admission to the university during a "non-<:ompetitive situation." He describes the current situation as being "non-competitive." When the new federal law becomes effective, the dual system will be maintained but, in accordance with the (Continued on page 2) |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for 19741018 1