19750131 1 |
Previous | 1 of 28 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Vol. XLVI No. 18 . Room 117, Otter HaD, Louisville, Ky ~ 40208 January 31 , 1975 Student wounded by police listed in satisfactory condition by Kenny Vandevelde Larry Basham, the stt.ide.nt who was shot by a campus policeman early W~dnesday morning (January 22), has been listed in satisfactory condition at Norton's Children's Hospital. He , was transferred to Norton's from General Hospital last weekend. Basham originally had been listed in serious condition, with internal bleeding and a punctured lung. When the lung failed to inflate after an appropriate length of time, he was placed on the critical list. But early yesterday morning, a nurse at Norton's told the Cardinal that Basham was in satisfactory condition and resting comfortably. Basham, and another student involved in the incident, Joseph Groetsch, were charged with third degree burglary. The trial date was set last week for early March. . Sergeant George Robinson, the officer . involved in the incident, was reassigned to a desk job Monday morning. Prior to Monday, Robinson had been on administrative leave, pending an investigation ·into the shooting by the Department of Public Safety. The investigation is awai~ng the completion of a separate investigation by the Louisville Police. · In a related development, three representatives of the Louisville Civil liberties Unionmet Tuesday afternoon. with Director of Public Relations David Baker, Legal Affairs Officer Ed Paul, and Assistant Vice-President for Financial Affairs Bill Davidson to discuss the incident. . The LCLU representatives told the university official that they "have a practice of regularly investigating . any instance where excessive force may have been used." Paul told the LCLU representatives that" he could not comment on the specifics of the case for fear· of jeopardizing the trial. But he did agree to answer questions of a general nature or relating to the university's statement on the incident. One of the LCLU representatives asked Paul why Robinson used a gun to hit Basl}am rather than a nightstick. "I assume the p<_>lice are issued billy clubs,~ he said. "11lat is a false assumption," replied Paul. h A night sergeant on duty told t e Ctudi1Uii that all the public safety officers are issued night sticks and are expected to carry them with them when out on a call. Asked why it was nece~ry for the campus police to carry guns, Davids~n told the civil libertarians that secunty officers have been ftred upon while performing their duties. Davidson also told the men that Robinson had graduated from the Louisville Police Adademy, and was qualified as an "expert" in weapons. The LCLU representatives also wanted to know what action had been taken with regard to Robinson. Paul said Robinson haP been placed on administrative leave, pending. Public Safety's investigation. "You must remember that such a thing is a traumatic shock. for the policeman himself," he added. In response to another question, Baker told the men that grievances against campus police are taken to the officer's immediate superior, and through ordinary administrative channels. He said there was no special review board to study police' grievances. The discussion also covered the university's position on Robinson's use of his gun. Paul told the LCLU representatives that he believed Robinson was justified in drawing his gun, since it was dark in the tunnel and the three suspects could have been aimed. He said Robinson would not necessarily have been justified ·in firing, but that that was irrelevant since Robinson didn't intentionally frre anyway. "I think I'm willing to concede that," one of the LCU representatives said. Pbotopaph by JUct Yetter Construction began early this week on a new twmel system between the University College and .~atural Sciences buildings. A&S Student Council approves new fees by Steve Wingf~eld The Arts & Sciences ·student Council this week approved new fees in the Departments of · Health, Physical Education and Recreation, Geography and Natural Sciences. Clark Wood, Chairman of HPER, appeared before the council to answer objections to the proposed fees on HPER courses.• A $5.00 fee for each physical education activity class had been proposed to the Council. Wood stated that enrollment in HPER ctivity classes had increased dramatically · while funding of HPER had remaj.ned constant, except for the standard inflation increaie: Due to the rise in the replacement costs of necessary equipment for the classes, Wood said that the breaking point had been reached. Students, he said, would have to begin supplying their own equipment for the classes. He further stated that cost of equipment for some classes could be $25.00 for each student. Wood also said that more and better equipment could be purchased by the department than by the student if the fee were approved. Responding to a council member's question, Wood stated that the $5.00 figure had been assigned by the A&S Dean's Office. Wood said that originally he had r.ecormnended a $5.00 per year fee, but the dean's office requested a $5.00 per semester fee . He added that he would not be opposed to changing the fee to either $3.00 or S4 .00. After Wood left the council meeting, a motion was made to approve the new fee at $3.00 per activity course. Also included in the motion were $5.00 fees for Nat Sci 312 and Nat Sci 320 and a $5.00 per hour lab fee (to a maximum of $7 .SO per course) for those Geography courses concerning photogramety and cartography. There was no resistance to the proposed Geography and · Natural Science fees. Discussion on the proposed Physical Education Activities fee was heated. A general consensus that the fees were needed by HPER was reached by the council members. An amendment to change the $3.00 activity fee to a $5 .00 fee was then offered. After discu~ion, the amendment was adopted. Reasons cited by council members for r~sing the fee $2.00 were that they felt that HPER was ·being penalized by the university administration in the allocation of funds and by raising the fee they felt HPER could purchase better equipment. The main motion, to assess a flat fee of $5.00 for each HPER activity course as well as the Natural Science and Geography fees, was then asopted by a vote of 13 to 3, with S abstentions. The rootjon was passed with the following stiupulations: 1) All money raised by the fees will be returned to the departments for which the fee is assessed. 2) The approval of the fees is null if the fees for laboratory courses (approved by the A&S Council during the Summer of 1974) are not re-submitted and re-approved by the Council before the start of the Fall, 1975 semester. 3) Within 60 days after the beginning of a semester the Financial Affairs Office will notify the appropriate departments of the amount of money they are to receive. A&S Council policy calls for periodic review of all fees approved by the Council.
Object Description
Title | The Louisville Cardinal, January 31, 1975. |
Volume | XLVI |
Issue | 18 |
Description | The University of Louisville’s undergraduate newspaper. The title of this publication has varied over the years, but with the exception of the period 1928-1930, when it was known as the U. of L. News, the title has always been a variation of The Cardinal. |
Subject |
Newspapers College student newspapers and periodicals University of Louisville--Students--Periodicals |
Date Original | 1975-01-31 |
Object Type | Newspapers |
Source | Scanned from microfilm in the Louisville Cardinal newspapers collection. Item Number ULUA Cardinal 19750131 |
Citation Information | See https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/description/collection/cardinal#conditions for guidance on citing this item. To cite the digital version, add its Reference URL (found by following the link in the header above the digital file) |
Collection | Louisville Cardinal Newspapers Collection |
Collection Website | https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/cardinal |
Digital Publisher | University of Louisville Archives and Special Collections |
Date Digital | 2019-01-29 |
Format | application/pdf |
Ordering Information | To inquire about reproductions, permissions, or for information about prices see: http://library.louisville.edu/archives/order. Please cite the Image Number when ordering. |
Image Number | ULUA Cardinal 19750131 |
Rating |
Description
Title | 19750131 1 |
Full Text | Vol. XLVI No. 18 . Room 117, Otter HaD, Louisville, Ky ~ 40208 January 31 , 1975 Student wounded by police listed in satisfactory condition by Kenny Vandevelde Larry Basham, the stt.ide.nt who was shot by a campus policeman early W~dnesday morning (January 22), has been listed in satisfactory condition at Norton's Children's Hospital. He , was transferred to Norton's from General Hospital last weekend. Basham originally had been listed in serious condition, with internal bleeding and a punctured lung. When the lung failed to inflate after an appropriate length of time, he was placed on the critical list. But early yesterday morning, a nurse at Norton's told the Cardinal that Basham was in satisfactory condition and resting comfortably. Basham, and another student involved in the incident, Joseph Groetsch, were charged with third degree burglary. The trial date was set last week for early March. . Sergeant George Robinson, the officer . involved in the incident, was reassigned to a desk job Monday morning. Prior to Monday, Robinson had been on administrative leave, pending an investigation ·into the shooting by the Department of Public Safety. The investigation is awai~ng the completion of a separate investigation by the Louisville Police. · In a related development, three representatives of the Louisville Civil liberties Unionmet Tuesday afternoon. with Director of Public Relations David Baker, Legal Affairs Officer Ed Paul, and Assistant Vice-President for Financial Affairs Bill Davidson to discuss the incident. . The LCLU representatives told the university official that they "have a practice of regularly investigating . any instance where excessive force may have been used." Paul told the LCLU representatives that" he could not comment on the specifics of the case for fear· of jeopardizing the trial. But he did agree to answer questions of a general nature or relating to the university's statement on the incident. One of the LCLU representatives asked Paul why Robinson used a gun to hit Basl}am rather than a nightstick. "I assume the p<_>lice are issued billy clubs,~ he said. "11lat is a false assumption," replied Paul. h A night sergeant on duty told t e Ctudi1Uii that all the public safety officers are issued night sticks and are expected to carry them with them when out on a call. Asked why it was nece~ry for the campus police to carry guns, Davids~n told the civil libertarians that secunty officers have been ftred upon while performing their duties. Davidson also told the men that Robinson had graduated from the Louisville Police Adademy, and was qualified as an "expert" in weapons. The LCLU representatives also wanted to know what action had been taken with regard to Robinson. Paul said Robinson haP been placed on administrative leave, pending. Public Safety's investigation. "You must remember that such a thing is a traumatic shock. for the policeman himself," he added. In response to another question, Baker told the men that grievances against campus police are taken to the officer's immediate superior, and through ordinary administrative channels. He said there was no special review board to study police' grievances. The discussion also covered the university's position on Robinson's use of his gun. Paul told the LCLU representatives that he believed Robinson was justified in drawing his gun, since it was dark in the tunnel and the three suspects could have been aimed. He said Robinson would not necessarily have been justified ·in firing, but that that was irrelevant since Robinson didn't intentionally frre anyway. "I think I'm willing to concede that," one of the LCU representatives said. Pbotopaph by JUct Yetter Construction began early this week on a new twmel system between the University College and .~atural Sciences buildings. A&S Student Council approves new fees by Steve Wingf~eld The Arts & Sciences ·student Council this week approved new fees in the Departments of · Health, Physical Education and Recreation, Geography and Natural Sciences. Clark Wood, Chairman of HPER, appeared before the council to answer objections to the proposed fees on HPER courses.• A $5.00 fee for each physical education activity class had been proposed to the Council. Wood stated that enrollment in HPER ctivity classes had increased dramatically · while funding of HPER had remaj.ned constant, except for the standard inflation increaie: Due to the rise in the replacement costs of necessary equipment for the classes, Wood said that the breaking point had been reached. Students, he said, would have to begin supplying their own equipment for the classes. He further stated that cost of equipment for some classes could be $25.00 for each student. Wood also said that more and better equipment could be purchased by the department than by the student if the fee were approved. Responding to a council member's question, Wood stated that the $5.00 figure had been assigned by the A&S Dean's Office. Wood said that originally he had r.ecormnended a $5.00 per year fee, but the dean's office requested a $5.00 per semester fee . He added that he would not be opposed to changing the fee to either $3.00 or S4 .00. After Wood left the council meeting, a motion was made to approve the new fee at $3.00 per activity course. Also included in the motion were $5.00 fees for Nat Sci 312 and Nat Sci 320 and a $5.00 per hour lab fee (to a maximum of $7 .SO per course) for those Geography courses concerning photogramety and cartography. There was no resistance to the proposed Geography and · Natural Science fees. Discussion on the proposed Physical Education Activities fee was heated. A general consensus that the fees were needed by HPER was reached by the council members. An amendment to change the $3.00 activity fee to a $5 .00 fee was then offered. After discu~ion, the amendment was adopted. Reasons cited by council members for r~sing the fee $2.00 were that they felt that HPER was ·being penalized by the university administration in the allocation of funds and by raising the fee they felt HPER could purchase better equipment. The main motion, to assess a flat fee of $5.00 for each HPER activity course as well as the Natural Science and Geography fees, was then asopted by a vote of 13 to 3, with S abstentions. The rootjon was passed with the following stiupulations: 1) All money raised by the fees will be returned to the departments for which the fee is assessed. 2) The approval of the fees is null if the fees for laboratory courses (approved by the A&S Council during the Summer of 1974) are not re-submitted and re-approved by the Council before the start of the Fall, 1975 semester. 3) Within 60 days after the beginning of a semester the Financial Affairs Office will notify the appropriate departments of the amount of money they are to receive. A&S Council policy calls for periodic review of all fees approved by the Council. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for 19750131 1