Louisville Lawyer
VOL. XVII, NO. 1 Fall, 1972
Revisions Of The Kentucky
Workmen's Compensation Law
By William E. Biggs and
Harold L. Adams
With the passage of Senate Bill
184, effective January 1, 1973, the
1972 General Assembly enacted a
major revision of the Kentucky
Workmen's Compensation law.
The new law expands coverage
to many persons never before
under the mandatory state act;
increases maximum weekly payment
at the beginning of l973 to
$81, and extends the payment
period from 425 weeks to the worker's
lifetime, or in case of death
of a husband to the period of
widow hood. Compulsory coverage
was extended to all employers of
one or more employees, with the
exception of . agricultural and casual
employment. Burial allowances
were increased from $500
to $1,500, and a $3,500 ceiling on
medical expenses is eliminated.
Perhaps the most discussed
changes were with regard to
pneumonoconiosis or "black lung".
In the past proof in such cases
has been difficult because of its
similarity to non-occupational
lung disorders. Under the new
act, whenever there has been an
employment exposure for 10 years
or more to an industrial hazard
sufficient to cause the disability,
there shall be a rebuttable presumption
that the death of disability
was due to the compensable
pneumoconiosis, and when
lung x-ray diagnosis shows opacities
greater than one certimeter
in diameter there shall be an irrebuttable
presumption that he is
totally disabled by black lung.
Under the old act, all black lung
benefits were paid from the program's
Special Fund maintained
by assessments against insurance
companies dealing in workmen's
compensation insurance in the
state. under the new low coal
companies will be paying 25% of
all black lung awards and the remaining
75% will be paid from
the Special Fund. In the past black
lung payments have amounted to
about 90% of the Special Fun's
total outlay.
Senate Bill 184 made a major
change affecting mandatory coverage
of all employers, other
than those in agriculture, that
have one or more employees subject
to the act. It specifically includes
coverage of employees of
the Commonwealth, any agency
thereof, and each county, city of
any class, school district, sewer
district, drainage district, tax district,
public or quasi-public corporation,
or any other political
subdivision or political entity of
the state. Under the old law, election
to operate under the act was
not mandatory. The new act clarifies
and spells out in detail what
employees are covered by the act.
With a few exceptions, it expressly
covers every person, including
minors, whether lawfully or unlawfully
employed, and covers
every executive officer of a corporation.
This was previously not
true. It also extends coverage to
members of volunteer fire and
police departments, civil defense
employees, members of the Kentucky
National Guard while on
duty, and to individuals who regularly
sell or deliver newspapers.
Among the categories of employees
who will still be exempt
are domestic servants where there
are less than two employees working
40 hours or more a week,
casual employees doing maintenance
or repair work about the
private home of the employer
when the work does not exceed
20 consequtive work days, persons
receiving only sustenance or aid
in exchange for their services
from any religious or charitable
organization, and persons employed
in agriculture. However, employers
of employees exempt
under the act may elect to be
subject to it.
The act enlarges the extraterritorial
coverage of the law by
providing that an employee hired
in Kentucky who performs work
in another state is covered by the
Kentucky law. The new act will
also establish some requirements
in compliance with Federal law.
A presumption is created that the
(Continued on Page 3)
LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY
Law-Related
Education
Programs
CHICAGO, Ill. - The publication
and availability for the first
time of a directory of law-related
education programs in the nation's
elementary and secondary schools
was announced November 7.
As prepared by the American
Bar Association's Special Committee
on Youth Education for
Citizenship, the directory describes
175 law-related projects
so that lawyers and educators can
learn about such programs in
their state or geographic region.
The free, 48-page directory's
publication was promoted by the
growing interest in recent years
in law-related citizenship education
by teachers, lawyers, school
administrators, judges, law enforcement
officials and other concerned
citizens, the ABA special
committee said.
In addition to the data on 175
law-related projects, the directory
also contains a special section
listing projects which can provide
help to bar associations and educators
interested in establishing
similar projects. Another directory
feature is a cross-reference
to educational activities currently
sponsored by bar associations.
The ABA said it plans to distribute
several thousand copies
of the directory to bar associations,
law schools and schools
systems across the country. Others
who want free copies in limited
quantities can write to the ABA
Special Committee on Youth Education
for Citizenship, 1155 East
60th St., Chicago, Ill. 60637, or
phone: 312-493-0533.
The ABA's Special Committee
on Youth Education for Citizenship
(YEFC) works with community
leaders, including lawyers
and educators, to develop lawrelated
educational programs for
elementary and secondary schools.
YEFC provides coordination for
the programs and serves as a national
clearinghouse for information
on curriculum materials,
teacher training techniques and
project models.
Page 2
Model PreArraignment
Code
The American Law Institute
issued, on August 2, 1972, the, Official
Draft No. 1 of the Model
Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure.
The parts of the Code
covered by this Draft deal with
such important issues in criminal
procedure as "stop-and-frisk", arrests,
and search and seizure.
The American Law Institute
sponsored this Project under
grants from the Ford Foundation.
The Institute, which is composed
of 1750 judges, lawyers and law
professors, was organized in 1923
"to promote clarification and simplification
of the law and its better
adaptation to social needs,
and to secure the better administration
of justice." The Institute
has previously published Restatements
of the Law of Contracts,
Torts, and Trusts, and on several
other subjects, and has sponsored
the Model Penal Code dealing
with the substantive definition of
the law of crimes and the Uniform
Commercial Code. The Model
Penal Code, promulgated in
1962, has peen the basis for criminal
code revision in many states.
The Uniform Commercial Code
has been adopted in 49 states.
Parts of the ALI's new Pre-Arraignment
Code have already
been adopted by state legislatures
in a few states, based on prelimi-· ,
nary drafts.
The new Pre-Arraignment Code
represents the first attempt to
draft comprehensive model legislation
for the states dealing with
the important and controversial
issues of police investigation of
crime. The Code takes account
both of recent Supreme Court
decisions in this area and of study
over several years of the actual
operations of criminal justice
agencies. Among the major features
of the new Code are the
following:
-Authorization to police to
stop and frisk a person whom
an officer reasonably suspects
of crime. To prevent excessive
and unfair use of this authorization,
it is subject to several
provisions designed to protect ___ .
individuals and is limited to use
in crimes against a person or
against property, thereby excluding
drug, gambling, and
prostitution offenses.
-Provisions encouraging use
of summons or citation instead
of arrest wherever possible.
-Limitation of so-called "no-
(Continued on Page 5)
THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
Comment
By Gill Johnson
The purpose of this comment is
to reflect on the past three years
that I have attended law school
at the University of Louisville. I
suppose that by writing this parting
note you might say that I'm
serving notice of my graduation
in December, so at least within
the three years that I've been
here I can finally do something
that will bring joy to the schooL
The title reads Comment-Three
Years, and so I will attempt to
enumerate some of my thoughts
and opinions of the last three
years, highly laced, of course, with
that wisdom and wit which has
become my trademark over the
last three years of study and
work.
There is one thing that rings
out in my mind, and for that
matter will always be remembered,
and that's the famous "look
to the right and look to the left"
cliche. Needless to say I didn't
look, and therefore I suppose
that's one of the reasons I'm still
here. My point being that one
cannot always agree with the administration
of any schooL After
---all the present administrat-ion is
the very same that puts the fear
of God in a freshman, works the
junior to death, and bores the
senior. But in my opinion this is
where the short comings of the
law school's administration ends.
There can be no argument that
at times both the students and
the faculty were at ends, but these
differences were met head on and
useful solutions were found. The
law schools serves a purpose to
the community, and that is to
supply the best possible lawyers
that it can. If the school were to
disregard student thoughts and
ideas then it would not meet
its obligation to the community.
Instead, I believe, that by providing
meanful student and faculity
relations, the school is building
more than an educated lawyer.
The administration has provided
an atmosphere in which the student
can study more than law and
perhaps pick up those traits which
makes both a successful lawyer
and a true professionaL
The school is made of more
than just a hard working administration
and faculity, and that is
the student body. I've notice over
the years that the students in this
school are perhaps not the sharpest
in the nation, but at least the
most concerned. Never once have
I seen a student fail to take at
Fall, 1972
Three Years
least some interest in the activities
of this school; participation in
such activities as the SBA, and
moot court club are perfect examples
of what I mean.
Regardless of what has been
said and done over the past three
years, one thing stands out and
that is the student faculity relationship
which, when it works together
produces the kind of professional
who can serve the community
welL This is the type of
men and women that law schools
must produce, and it is impossible
to do so when students are not
given some sort of say in the administration,
and its policies. Students
should not have an absolute
say in all administrative rules and
policies, but their opinions should
be heard. When they are heard
there is a better possibility that
all issues will be resolved. When
any administration lends its ear
to the student body, and then
follows some of its suggestions,
there can be little room for criticism
of the administration since
it is seeking the best possible atmosphere
in which a person can
work. The end result is the professional
who can serve the community
with more tools at his
command.
It would be easy to list those
things which the law school administration
has done which I
have disagreed with, and those
things which they have done
which I have agreed with. This
is not the measure of a good law
school, for that measure lies in
the product which the school produces.
Perhaps one might look to
see the famous names which have
appeared on the registration lists
of the school, but this is not the
true product. The true product
is found in the man who has achieved
success in his profession
through the use of the tools he
has picked up in law schooL This
law school provides the needed
tools which can guarantee success
if one wishes to apply them. So
while it may be proper to criticize
the administration of this
school in certain matters, one cannot
take the position that the
administration does not achieve
the goals it has set out to achieve.
This comment may not influence
a lot of people, but it is one
man's opinion of what this school
has offered not only to me but to
countless others in producing
some of the finest attorneys in our
community.
Fall, 1972
Workman's
(Continued from Page 1)
injury was work related where
there is unrebutted prima facie
evidence so indicating and the employee
is killed or physically unable
to testify. In instances where
someone other than the employer
is liable for the injury, the employee
may have an option of proceeding
either at common law or
under workmen's compensation,
but he may not recover from
both.
The new legislation creates a
Rehabilitation Panel to assist in
restoration of the injured employee.
Refusal to accept rehabilitation
shall result in a 50% loss
of compensation for each week of
refusal. This is a positive step
and a needed one, since past rehabilitation
provisions have been
ineffective.
New provisions make the last
employer, in whose employment
the claimant was last exposed, liable
for an occupational disease
and thus places the burden on
him to join any earlier employer.
The period of time for filing ec··
cupational-disease claims has been
increased from one year to three,
and from one to two years in all
other claims.
An Uninsured Employers Funds
will be created to be administered
by the board. Initially this fund
will be funded by transferring
$100,000 from the board's maintenance
fund. Thereafter, 1t will
be funded through fines and penalties
collected under the act. The
purpose is to assure payment of
benefits to an employee whose
employer is insolvent or without
proper insurance coverage.
The law in the past has permitted
a reopening of a claim
only for a change of conditions,
mistake or fraud. The new act will
allow a reopening for newly discovered
evidence. This is in compliance
with the Federal Coal
Mine Health and Safety Act of
1969.
Still another change increases
the qualification for Workmen's
Compensation Board members to
the same as those for Circuit
Judges. The board members will
serve staggered terms. An attempt
was made in the legislature to
create a full-time board, but this
failed.
The Federal Coal Mine Health
and Safety Act has focused its
attention on four main areas; the
permissible dust levels in the
mines, the frequency of X-ray
examinations for miners, the ex-
THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
Compensation
tent of the black lung benefits,
and the expansion of a medical
research program. This act grants
to the U. S. Secretary of Interior
the power to develop and promulgate
health and safety standards.
He also has investigatory powers.
If he finds that any of the mandatory
health and safety standards
are being violated or that
an imminent danger exists, the
violating mines will be subject to
closure. A violation may cost
$10,000 each or if it be a willful
violation then it may be as much
as $25,000. The act also sets out
the procedures for determining
the dust concentration in the
mines. The Federal Act gave the
states a deadline of December 31,
1972 for conforming. The new
Kentucky revisions have enabled
the state just barely to meet the
deadline of the federal standards
for compensation, health and
safety. This means that mine
operation costs will raise appreciably,
but for the first time the
miners will be able to work in an
atmosphere relatively free from
dust if the new standards are properly
met.
Minority Hiring
For Prison Reform
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Hiring
more personnel from minority
groups to work at all levels in
the nation's prisons was called
a "must" today by the American
Bar Association's Commission on
Correctional Facilities and Services.
While noting that other professional
and public interest groups
have expressed similar positions,
the ABA Commission said that
"responsible government leaders"
should renew and intensify their
efforts "as a correctional reform
'must.'"
ly The Commission's call for
more minority hiring of prison
personnel was contained in a newly
published booklet outlining the
scope of the recruitment situation
in recent years. The publication
also highlights programs by the
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, as well
as Illinois, California and South
Carolina which are designed to
bring more minority persons into
the corrections labor force.
According to the Commission
booklet, the four recruitment programs
were launched by progres-
Page 3
sive d i r e c t or s of corrections.
"They typify the insights and
flexibility demanded of the modern
correctional administrator and
of departments seeking to keep
abreast of the difficult demands,
new pressures, and changing circumstances
confronting correctional
systems," the booklet added.
Former New Jersey Governor
Richard J. Hughes, Commission
chairman, said he hoped the programs
outlined in the brochure
will activate others in minority
corrections recruitment across the
country.
Citing available statistics on
prison employees at the state
level, the Commission stated that
broader minority participation in
the corrections field is "an indispensable
ingredient for balance,
effectiveness and public confidence
in our correctional machinery
.. .'' It said that minority representation
on correctional staffs
is not in adequate proportion to
the number of minority inmates.
Copies of the 12-page booklet
are available from the ABA Commission
on Correctional Facilities
and Services, 1705 DeSales Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036.
The 23-member ABA Commission
was started in 1970 as an
interdisciplinary group to spearhead
Bar efforts to improve correctional
systems. Its program development
activities are funded
by the Ford Foundation.
F acuity Profile
By Bob Kirk
Editors note: The purpose of this
publication is to maintain close
connection and cooperation between
the school, the student body
and the alumni. One of the most
effective methods of achieving
this goal is to introduce new members
of the faculty and to list
some of the areas of interest to
certain faculty members. This
column is, therefore, appearing
for the first time and will appear
in each publication. The purpose
being to introduce our alumni and
students not only to new professors,
but also to discuss some recent
studies, research and developments
of certain faculty members.
The editors of the Louisville
Lawyer hope that this column will
be of help to those who share
the same interest of the professors
at the University and will
serve as an effective means of
communication between t h e
alumni and the University of
Louisville School of Law.
Page 4
NEW PROFESSORS AND LECTURES
AT THE UNIVERSITY
OF LOUISVILLE SCHOOL OF
LAW:
Kathleen L. Brickey, B.A. With
Distinction; Departmental Honors
(University of Kentucky, 1965);
J .D. With Distinction (University
of Kentucky, 1968); Kentucky
Crime Commission, 1970-71; Kentucky
Judicial Conference and
Council, 1971-1972; Assistant Professor,
University of Louisville,
1972-.
Leonard R. Jaffee, (Philadelphia
Musical Academy); J.D.
(Rutgers School of Law, 1972);
Assistant Professor, University of
Louisville, 1972-.
David J. Leibson, B.A. (Vanderbilt
University, 1966) ; J .D. (University
of Louisville, 1969 ; LL.M.
(Harvard University, 1970) ; practiced
with firm of Leibson &
Franklin, P.S.C., Louisville, Kentucky,
1970-1972; Lectu·rer, University
of Louisville, 1971-1972;
Assistant Professor, 1972-.
Martin R. Levy, B.S. (Lafayette
College, 1957); M.CH.E. (University
of Virginia, 1957) ; LL.B.
(University of Maryland, 1967) ;
admitted to District of Columbia
bar, 1968; Patent attorney, E.I.
DuPont, 1967-1972; Assistant Professor,
University of Louisville,
1972-.
Paul Rogerson, The Law Faculty,
The University of Leeds,
England; Visiting Assistant Professor,
University of Louisville,
1972-1973.
William A. Blodgett, Jr., B.A.
(University of North Carolina,
1968); J.D. cum laude (University
of Louisville, 1970) . Admitted to
Kentucky bar, 1971 ; practice with
Woodward, Hobson & Fulton,
1971-; member of Louisville, Kentucky
State and American Bar
Association; Lecturer, University
of Louisville, 1972-.
Judith S. Boggs, B.A. cum laude
(Brooklyn College, City University
of New York, 1966); J .D.
(University of Chicago, 1969). Employed
by Kentucky Human
Rights Commission, 1969; Legal
Counsel, Department of Mental
Health, 1969-; member of Kentucky
Bar Association; Lecturer,
University of Louisville, 1972-.
Homer Joseph Parrent, B.A.
(University of Louisville, 1969);
J.D. cum laude (University of
Louisville, 1971). Admitted to
Kentucky bar, 1972; partner, law
firm of Parrent & Parrent, 1972- ;
Lecturer, University of Louisville.
1972-.
Ronald D. Ray, A.B. (Centre
College of Kentucky, 1964); J.D.
THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
magna cum laude (University of
Louisville, 1971) ; admitted to Kentucky
Bar, 1972; practicing attorney,
Greenebaum Grissom Doll
Matthews & Boone, Louisville,
Kentucky, 1972-; Lecturer, University
of Louisville, 1972-.
Sam M. Ryan, J.D. (University
of Louisville, 1952.) Employed by
City of Louisville 1952-61 ; private
practice, 1961-62; Patient Advocate,
Department of Mental
Health, 1962- ; member of Kentucky
Bar Association; Lecturer,
University of Louisville, 1972-.
David A. Schechter, B.A. (University
of Michigan, 1959; J.D.
(University of Michigan Law
School 1962) ; LL.M. in Taxation
(New York University Law
School, 1963); CPA (Illinois and
Kentucky). Admitted to practice
in New York, Illinois and Kentucky.
Associated with Arthur
Anderson & Co., 1965-67; Tax
Counsel, Brown & Williamson
Tobacco Corp., 1967- ; Lecturer,
University of Louisville, 1972-.
Professor Petrilli is currently
doing research for the Louisville
area Family Planning Council.
The Council is being funded by
H.E.W. (Department of Health,
Education and Welfare, by a grant
te the Louisville area in conjunction
with the Kentucky State
wide plan for Family Planning
Services.
Professor Petrilli's work, which
will be included in a report on
birth control and planned parenthood,
in his own words, "consists
of finding out exactly what
the present Kentucky law is, if
possible." The law in this area, is
extremely vauge, especially as
Petrilli points out, as to sterilization
as a means of contraception.
At present, no Kentucky law
exists on the subject. As a result,
he is currently drawing
analogies from other state case
law and existing related Kentucky
statutes, hoping that these in turn
will shed some light on which
policy may be formulated. This
information will then he presented
to the council for the purpose
of explicitly defining what services
they can lawfully provide,
while at the same time, insulating
themselves from possible liability.
Thusly, enabling the council to
fulfill its overall goal of providing
up to date family planning
information.
Besides this project, Professor
Petrilli is also busy putting together
a pocket part to be included
in this book on family
law. The primary emphasis in
this work will be the explanation
Fall, 1972
of the new Kentucky No Fault
Divorce Law.
Petrilli feels no fault is good,
because it eliminates the adversary
effect that surrounds a divorce
proceeding and thusly, conflicts
between the parties will be
kept to a minimum. As a result,
lie because they won't have to
protect their interest in order to
obtain a divorce.
Assistant professor Brickey,
currently in her first year of full
time teaching, has prepared in
conjunction with Paul Murphy,
a former Law School faculty
member, an Introduction to a
Symposium on the new Kentucky
Penal Code, to be published in
the Kentucky Law Journal. Prior
to this work, Professor Brickey
was one of the four drafters of
the Code.
The purpose of the Introduction,
Professor Brickey states, "was to
point out to the legislature the
crucial areas in the Code which
need revision before the law becomes
effective, July 1, 1974. One
area in particular that needs consideration
is what Professor Brickey
calls Kentucky's "Expre Facto
Law." The Code as adopted
permits a defendant charged with
an offense, committed prior to the
effective date of the Code, to elect
to be tried under the Code.
In addition to the questionable
constitutionality of the provision,
it is phrased in language which
is ambliguous as to whether the
election may be made before the
effective date of the Code. If
it is intended to be limited to
cases involving crimes committed
prior to, but tried after July 1,
1974, docket and manipulation
problems are certain to arise.
Another problem which requires
immediate attention is inconsistent
and contradictory language
defining culpable mental
states.
Professor Brickey also points
to the purpose of the Kentucky
Penal Code; that of codifying and
defining all crimes within a comprehensive
statutory scheme. To
avoid having conflicting and overlapping
statutes, the Code contains
a general repeal provision
which abolishes specific existing
criminal laws. The 1972 General
Assembly enacted a number of
new criminal statutes which have
become effective and which will,
when the Penal Code becomes
law, conflict with its provisions.
Unless these individual statutes
are repealed in the 1974 legisla-
(Continued on Page 5)
Fall, 1972 THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
Pre-Arraignment Code
knock" arrests to where there is
danger of escape, harm to the
officer or to another person or
destruction of evidence.
-Limiting arrests on private
premises to day time hours except
where there is a danger of
escape or harm to a person or
to property.
-A complete codification of
the law relating to searches and
seizures including searches pursuant
to a warrant, searches
following arrest, inspectorial
searches, and border, vehicular
and emergency searches. These
search and seizure provisions
include:
-A new procedure for impounding
and court supervision
where files of documents
are seized by the
police;
-Authorization to search
the occupants of automobiles
where a search of the automobile
is authorized and
there is reason to suspect the
occupant may have things
subject to seizure on his person;
-A limitation of the exclusionary
rule with respect
to illegally seized evidence to
situations where the court
finds the violation of defenCI«
ants to have been substantial.
This limited application of the
exclusionary rule is specifically
conditioned on there being
judicial interpretation of
the federal or state constitutions
requiring a broader exclusion
of evidence.
The Reporter for the Pre-Arraignment
Code with general responsibility
for the Project is
James Vorenberg, Professor of
Law at Harvard Law School and
former Executive Director of the
President's Crime Commission.
Professor Telford Taylor of Columbia's
Law School served as
Associate Reporter with special
responsibility for search and seizure.
In addition, Professors Paul
Bator and Charles Fried of Harvard
Law School and Professor
Edward Barrett of the University
of California Law School at Davis
participated in work on the Code.
The Reporters were assisted by a
distinguished Advisory Committee
consisting of police officials,
prosecuting and defense lawyers,
judges, and law professors.
Commenting on the Code, Pro-fessor
James Vorenberg said:
"Probably the most important
aspect of the Code is that it
seeks to move the early stages
of criminal procedure out of the
shadows and to encourage the
state legislatures to take responsibility
for how they expect
their police and other criminal
justice officials to act in various
situations. An important premise
of the Code is that if the
police are told what the ground
rules are it will enhance the
protection of individual rights.
It will also help avoid situations
where the police are reluctant
to pursue criminal investigations
diligently because they are
simply unsure what they may
and may not do. For example,
when the law is unclear when,
where and how an officer may
stop and frisk a suspect, the result
may be either an unjustified
intrusion on the individual
or the loss by the police of a
legitimate opportunity to solve
a crime. Either result is a serious
loss to society.
"We recognize that this is an
area in which the United States
Supreme Court and other courts
will continue to decide cases
that will play an important
role in defining permissible conduct
by public officials. But individual
cases cannot fully provide
the sort of guidance which
is necessary for officials and
members of the public, and in
this respect the Code may be
seen as supplementing the continuing
course of constitutional
decisions."
Good Luck To December
Graduates
From The Staff Of The
Lawyer
Page 5
(Continued fr01n p. 2)
In his Foreword to Official
Draft No. ' 1, Professor Herbert
Wechsler of Columbia Law
School, Director of the Institute
says:
The Institute has been engaged
for a long time in the attempt
to formulate a model code of
pre-arraignment p r o c e d u r e,
meaning thereby a statute governing
the major steps in criminal
law enforcement prior to
the point when trial begins. The
enterprise was undertaken in
recognition of the difficulty and
importance of the problems of
authority and of procedure calling
for consideration in this
area, the developing Supreme
Court interpretations of the constitutional
imperatives to be respected
and the magnitude of
· legislative interest in achieving
so far as possible an acceptable
statutory delineation of the
basic norms. These considerations
are even more significant
today than when the work
began.
In addition to those parts of
the Code presently being promulgated,
work is proceeding on additional
sections dealing with such
important issues as police interrogation,
line-ups and plea bargaining.
(Continued from Page 4)
tive session, they will substantially
impair the function of the
Code.
While Professor Brickey feels
that the Code as enacted is generally
good, she states that the
legislature must come to grips
with these deficiencies before the
Code can operate as an effective
and precise piece of legislation.
<!tQe
1llnuisuille
i£awyer
Editor
Gill Johnson
Editorial Staff:
Dick Throgmorton
Amelia Polsky
Bob Kirk
THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
FORM 3547 REQUESTED
Non-Profit Org.
U.S. Postage
PAID
Louisville, Ky.
Permit No. 435
