19721214 1 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Looking back ... A former student remembers the university I'm out of UL, have been for a year and a half: three ·erne ters, if that makes time more real for you. ot a great deal of per pect1ve. it could be argued. But it's a per onal plateau of sorts, one that offer no conclu ions, only impre ions about my acaderrtic experiences. Many, many would be influences have faded, wisdomlcss, victims of time and verbo ity. Sorting out influence is pointing a finger at part of your consciousne s and saying I got that (the tate of mind or way of thought) from Thursday, Dec. 14, 1972 him (the teacher.) Words are not my memories. I have been mind molded by men who reach; they went beyond games, stuffiness, half glasse and podiums to reach me. They gave their subjects, they gave themselve . Their respect , unlike many others oon forgotten, was not earned with each repetition of their own thoughts, but was given to me freely for the small price of rrtine. I absorbed a re pect for wisdom, curiousity for all life merely by sitting or tanding near (hallways and lounges are a joy!) these few men. Vol. xliv No. 15 THE LOUISVIL E CARDI AL Rm. 117, Otter Hall, University of Louiwille, Kentucky 40208 Special Issue on Teachers & New Courses CO TENTS OF THIS ISSUE: Dr. Web ter Retires .......................... Page 2 The B t Teachers ............................. Pa e 3 ew Cour e At UL ........................... Page 5 Fire At Cardinal Inn ......................... Page 8 A Teacher Reward ........................... Page 8 Looking ahead ... Teaching Learning: Some Suggestions Teaching at this university must sometimes be a very frustrating experience. Many of the teachers I have seen are being cheated They are cheated in that they don't always receive salaries commensurate with their talents and efforts, but, more important, they are also cheated by their students. Too often teachers bend, twist, adjust, and change to help their students, only to receive the same suspicious stares, the same attempts to get a good grade, the same lackadaisical attitude. This experience may only be true for a minority of teachers, but that minority contains the best teachers, the ones who care what their students do, who care whether the material is understood, that care whether they get across that social and intellectual gulf that separates the instructor from the learner. The gap is unfortunately real. Few teachers are able to obliterate the social barrier that our "educational system produces. Some teachers do not even try, do not recognize that personal equality is necessary for the most effective learning and they don't try to overcome the obstacle, but many do. Some teachers seem to make the effort to remain flexible , to allow for the problems, to correct their teaching deficiencies. But teachers are professionals and they are expected to '-"Orrect their errors. What about studnets? What do they do to correct deficiencies? They are paying for the teaching, the opportunities that the University offers. What do they get for their money? Do they even try to get their money's wo, th? Opportunities missed I don't often find that to be the case. Too many students at UL let pass most of their opportunities to learn. It doesn't matter whether it is called apathy, laziness, lack of interest, or stupidigy, the phenomenon persists. It will continue to persist until students are awakened to their own foolishness. I am sure that few will change by reading this issue of the Cardinal, but one of the reasons for this special issue is to put just a little spark under a few students. II f l ' I • ... ,,, I now have a glimmer of understanding of the beauty of dedication, the force of love through teaching becau e of Thomas Mceaul. His total gift to his profession humbles, inspires. There is Leon Driskell. The immensity of his intellect, the poetic glow of his life will forever make me seek his awareness of the wondrous aura of everyman's soul. I know the delights of man's culture, the all encompassing humanity that I am part and product of because I have watched Robert McMahan pursue passions of his mind through the cultural montage of man's arts. From a stifling immediacy of mind Dr. Starling has expanded my perspecive from 1970's smug preoccupation t< awareness of the legacy of moden thought that built my society; challengin~ my consciousness with othe consciousnesses I am no longer narrow expanding understand ing, I a ·1 transformed. I forget others, I remember these. I walk in their shadows, their wisdom m} beginning. Glen Lawrenc( .....,......,., by ChMf• Miller Final blues •••• But what should students do that is different? There are as many answers to that as there are students, but I offer a few general directions that change might take place. One direction that would be valuable is for the students to begin to give the teachers more feedback. Even the most well-meaning and energetic instructor cannot correct defects that are not pointed out to .bini. This can be done openly, during class, or afterwards, in privjlte. It can be done by anonymous notes, by visits to the ombudswoman or the dean - as long as there is some corrective factor ·in the educational equation. This does not mean only complaints about actions taken- it could take the form of suggestions about things that are omitted from the teacher's presentation. Few teachers will tum down thoughtful and constructive suggestions. This follows right along with the next point - personal contact. No teacher has time to know an his or her students, but tbat ultimate limitation should not stop interested students from requesting conferences, oon¥ersations, meetings, etc. - any kind of direct, one-to-one contact. Often it is in private that the most muable advice,. the most thoughtful suaestions will be given to the student. SOmetimes it is s'-lrprising how eager teachers are to know what the student really tbinp and feels. Refusin& to be intimidated is another action that studen ts can use to improve their experience in class. Some teachers demand too much,. or overlook too many important facets, or refuse to let the students have a wice in the process. No oae is perfect, so the teacher should I !!I t fl f '~'"
Object Description
Title | The Louisville Cardinal, December 14, 1972. |
Volume | XLIV |
Issue | 15 |
Description | The University of Louisville’s undergraduate newspaper. The title of this publication has varied over the years, but with the exception of the period 1928-1930, when it was known as the U. of L. News, the title has always been a variation of The Cardinal. |
Subject |
Newspapers College student newspapers and periodicals University of Louisville--Students--Periodicals |
Date Original | 1972-12-14 |
Object Type | Newspapers |
Source | Scanned from microfilm in the Louisville Cardinal newspapers collection. Item Number ULUA Cardinal 19721214 |
Citation Information | See https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/description/collection/cardinal#conditions for guidance on citing this item. To cite the digital version, add its Reference URL (found by following the link in the header above the digital file) |
Collection | Louisville Cardinal Newspapers Collection |
Collection Website | https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/cardinal |
Digital Publisher | University of Louisville Archives and Special Collections |
Date Digital | 2019-01-29 |
Format | application/pdf |
Ordering Information | To inquire about reproductions, permissions, or for information about prices see: http://library.louisville.edu/archives/order. Please cite the Image Number when ordering. |
Image Number | ULUA Cardinal 19721214 |
Rating |
Description
Title | 19721214 1 |
Full Text | Looking back ... A former student remembers the university I'm out of UL, have been for a year and a half: three ·erne ters, if that makes time more real for you. ot a great deal of per pect1ve. it could be argued. But it's a per onal plateau of sorts, one that offer no conclu ions, only impre ions about my acaderrtic experiences. Many, many would be influences have faded, wisdomlcss, victims of time and verbo ity. Sorting out influence is pointing a finger at part of your consciousne s and saying I got that (the tate of mind or way of thought) from Thursday, Dec. 14, 1972 him (the teacher.) Words are not my memories. I have been mind molded by men who reach; they went beyond games, stuffiness, half glasse and podiums to reach me. They gave their subjects, they gave themselve . Their respect , unlike many others oon forgotten, was not earned with each repetition of their own thoughts, but was given to me freely for the small price of rrtine. I absorbed a re pect for wisdom, curiousity for all life merely by sitting or tanding near (hallways and lounges are a joy!) these few men. Vol. xliv No. 15 THE LOUISVIL E CARDI AL Rm. 117, Otter Hall, University of Louiwille, Kentucky 40208 Special Issue on Teachers & New Courses CO TENTS OF THIS ISSUE: Dr. Web ter Retires .......................... Page 2 The B t Teachers ............................. Pa e 3 ew Cour e At UL ........................... Page 5 Fire At Cardinal Inn ......................... Page 8 A Teacher Reward ........................... Page 8 Looking ahead ... Teaching Learning: Some Suggestions Teaching at this university must sometimes be a very frustrating experience. Many of the teachers I have seen are being cheated They are cheated in that they don't always receive salaries commensurate with their talents and efforts, but, more important, they are also cheated by their students. Too often teachers bend, twist, adjust, and change to help their students, only to receive the same suspicious stares, the same attempts to get a good grade, the same lackadaisical attitude. This experience may only be true for a minority of teachers, but that minority contains the best teachers, the ones who care what their students do, who care whether the material is understood, that care whether they get across that social and intellectual gulf that separates the instructor from the learner. The gap is unfortunately real. Few teachers are able to obliterate the social barrier that our "educational system produces. Some teachers do not even try, do not recognize that personal equality is necessary for the most effective learning and they don't try to overcome the obstacle, but many do. Some teachers seem to make the effort to remain flexible , to allow for the problems, to correct their teaching deficiencies. But teachers are professionals and they are expected to '-"Orrect their errors. What about studnets? What do they do to correct deficiencies? They are paying for the teaching, the opportunities that the University offers. What do they get for their money? Do they even try to get their money's wo, th? Opportunities missed I don't often find that to be the case. Too many students at UL let pass most of their opportunities to learn. It doesn't matter whether it is called apathy, laziness, lack of interest, or stupidigy, the phenomenon persists. It will continue to persist until students are awakened to their own foolishness. I am sure that few will change by reading this issue of the Cardinal, but one of the reasons for this special issue is to put just a little spark under a few students. II f l ' I • ... ,,, I now have a glimmer of understanding of the beauty of dedication, the force of love through teaching becau e of Thomas Mceaul. His total gift to his profession humbles, inspires. There is Leon Driskell. The immensity of his intellect, the poetic glow of his life will forever make me seek his awareness of the wondrous aura of everyman's soul. I know the delights of man's culture, the all encompassing humanity that I am part and product of because I have watched Robert McMahan pursue passions of his mind through the cultural montage of man's arts. From a stifling immediacy of mind Dr. Starling has expanded my perspecive from 1970's smug preoccupation t< awareness of the legacy of moden thought that built my society; challengin~ my consciousness with othe consciousnesses I am no longer narrow expanding understand ing, I a ·1 transformed. I forget others, I remember these. I walk in their shadows, their wisdom m} beginning. Glen Lawrenc( .....,......,., by ChMf• Miller Final blues •••• But what should students do that is different? There are as many answers to that as there are students, but I offer a few general directions that change might take place. One direction that would be valuable is for the students to begin to give the teachers more feedback. Even the most well-meaning and energetic instructor cannot correct defects that are not pointed out to .bini. This can be done openly, during class, or afterwards, in privjlte. It can be done by anonymous notes, by visits to the ombudswoman or the dean - as long as there is some corrective factor ·in the educational equation. This does not mean only complaints about actions taken- it could take the form of suggestions about things that are omitted from the teacher's presentation. Few teachers will tum down thoughtful and constructive suggestions. This follows right along with the next point - personal contact. No teacher has time to know an his or her students, but tbat ultimate limitation should not stop interested students from requesting conferences, oon¥ersations, meetings, etc. - any kind of direct, one-to-one contact. Often it is in private that the most muable advice,. the most thoughtful suaestions will be given to the student. SOmetimes it is s'-lrprising how eager teachers are to know what the student really tbinp and feels. Refusin& to be intimidated is another action that studen ts can use to improve their experience in class. Some teachers demand too much,. or overlook too many important facets, or refuse to let the students have a wice in the process. No oae is perfect, so the teacher should I !!I t fl f '~'" |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for 19721214 1