19750418 1 |
Previous | 1 of 36 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
' I I ( J • ' TheLouisville Cardinal Vol XLVI No. 28 Room 117, Otter Hall, Louisville, Ky. 40208 April 18, 1975 Same as witht:lrawal Pass-fail deadline extended in A&S By Steve Wingiteld The faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences this. week changed the pass-fail system so students can change from a letter grade to a pass-fail until the regular withdrawal date. The old catalog provision stated no changes from letter grade to pass-fail or vice versa could be made after the fourth week of the semester. Tt~ A&S standards and admissions committee originally proposed at the faculty meeting to move the decision date on pass-fail back to thf~ end of the drop-add (one week after the semester starts). When the standards and admissions oommittee proposal was mov~ed, students who sit on the faculty meetings with full voting status moved to amend the motion such that students could change the grade basis for a course up until two weeks after the announced mid-term ~examination period. Bruce Atherton, who moved the amendment, explained that students needed the extra time in order to gauge their standing in a course before making a decision on · pass-fail. He also said expanding the decision time would encourage students to expand their educational background by taking courses outside of their field of study in whcih they normally could not compete. The old provision in ilhe Catalog concerning pass-fail courses says a student who has been admitted to ~mior College may take one course a semc~ster outside of his major field. The main objection to student amendment centered on the optmon students would use the pass-fall as "nothing more than a tool'' to protect their grade point averages. During debate on the stu4ent amendment the amendment itself was amended so the decision dat4~ on pass-fail would be the same as the withdrawal date (four weeks before the 1end of the semester). The faculty approved the student amendment by a substantial margin. The faculty then defeated a Sbndards and Admissions committee proposal to not officially inform instructors as to whether or not a student 1~s taking a course on a pass-fail basis. In other action the faculty approved the addition of English 100 as part of the curriculum. Incoming freshmen who are deficient in writing skills will be required to take Eng 100 before being allowed to enter the regular Eng 101-102 courses, which are required for graduation. The English Department originally proposed the addition of Eng 100 because they said as much as 25% of incoming freslunen are so wanting in writing skills they cannot successfully do college level work. Controversy arose over whether a student should be granted credit for Eng 100. The course wiiJ be remedial in nature and some f41cu1ty members contended that credit should not be allowed for gaining a level of writing competency which the student should have before entering college. The faculty, after much debate, chose to allow the student credit for Eng J 00, but the credit will be used for determination of full-time status only and wiR not be counted towards graduation. In this issue Graduation changes .......... .4 Cardinal looks back ........... 7 Quintessence ............... 1 2 "Rivals" review ............. 14 Deathsedge concludes . ....... 18 Phototmaph by Jcbb llan~ Where are those warm spring days of yesterye•? Deane Petkus enjoy1ed the sunny weather a few years ago, but so far thti spring the gods of the weather haven't smiled upon Belknap campus. l.1 of L yearbook Deja-Vu, arri•v es The 1975 edition of Deja- Vu was released for sale to students yesterday. The cost for U of L students is $2.00 per ropy for the 232 page look at the year's people . and events. Copies are on sale at all campus bookstores and in the lobby of the U.C. Building. Editor Joe Fowler told the Cardinlll that only a limited number have been printed. "Anyone wishing to purchase a copy should do so as soon as possible," he said. He added that anyone who ordered a book in advance should pick up his copy at the table in the U.C. Building. Dejtl- Vu has been in production since August of last year. The final deadline for any material to be included in the coverage ,was late January. ''It's unfortunate that we can't cover anything that goes on after January but that's just how it has to be in order to get the book back in April," Fowler said. "This year, however, we're doing a supplement so we can -cover the NCAA basketball tournament." "You must · return the enclosed card in order to receive a copy of the supplement," added Mike Kraus, Deja- Vu business manager. "It wil1 be mailed out sometime in June." This is the second year that the yearbook has been called Deja- Vu. Before 1973, it was known as the Thoroughbred Due to internal staff problems, no book was published in 1973. Last year' therefore, with the book back in production, it was felt that a change of name would help the new yearbook establish its identity. Both the 1974 and 1975 editions of Deja- Vu provide sections 0111 groups and seniors, and in format arc similar to the classic yearbook style. This is in contrast to the recent magazine-type product that was attempted here in 1970 :and J 971 but was not well received. M~odcrn design techniques and, according to Fowler, · "very fine photography" giv·c ·the book a contemporary Joo k. "We've tried to include as many people and events throughout the year as possible," Fowler stated. "We feel we've improved over the 1974 bqok and hope next year's can be even bc~tter. I think that ten years from now:, a graduate should be able to pick up this book and remember what went oo her<~."
Object Description
Title | The Louisville Cardinal, April 18, 1975. |
Volume | XLVI |
Issue | 28 |
Description | The University of Louisville’s undergraduate newspaper. The title of this publication has varied over the years, but with the exception of the period 1928-1930, when it was known as the U. of L. News, the title has always been a variation of The Cardinal. |
Subject |
Newspapers College student newspapers and periodicals University of Louisville--Students--Periodicals |
Date Original | 1975-04-18 |
Object Type | Newspapers |
Source | Scanned from microfilm in the Louisville Cardinal newspapers collection. Item Number ULUA Cardinal 19750418 |
Citation Information | See https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/description/collection/cardinal#conditions for guidance on citing this item. To cite the digital version, add its Reference URL (found by following the link in the header above the digital file) |
Collection | Louisville Cardinal Newspapers Collection |
Collection Website | https://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/cardinal |
Digital Publisher | University of Louisville Archives and Special Collections |
Date Digital | 2019-01-29 |
Format | application/pdf |
Ordering Information | To inquire about reproductions, permissions, or for information about prices see: http://library.louisville.edu/archives/order. Please cite the Image Number when ordering. |
Image Number | ULUA Cardinal 19750418 |
Rating |
Description
Title | 19750418 1 |
Full Text | ' I I ( J • ' TheLouisville Cardinal Vol XLVI No. 28 Room 117, Otter Hall, Louisville, Ky. 40208 April 18, 1975 Same as witht:lrawal Pass-fail deadline extended in A&S By Steve Wingiteld The faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences this. week changed the pass-fail system so students can change from a letter grade to a pass-fail until the regular withdrawal date. The old catalog provision stated no changes from letter grade to pass-fail or vice versa could be made after the fourth week of the semester. Tt~ A&S standards and admissions committee originally proposed at the faculty meeting to move the decision date on pass-fail back to thf~ end of the drop-add (one week after the semester starts). When the standards and admissions oommittee proposal was mov~ed, students who sit on the faculty meetings with full voting status moved to amend the motion such that students could change the grade basis for a course up until two weeks after the announced mid-term ~examination period. Bruce Atherton, who moved the amendment, explained that students needed the extra time in order to gauge their standing in a course before making a decision on · pass-fail. He also said expanding the decision time would encourage students to expand their educational background by taking courses outside of their field of study in whcih they normally could not compete. The old provision in ilhe Catalog concerning pass-fail courses says a student who has been admitted to ~mior College may take one course a semc~ster outside of his major field. The main objection to student amendment centered on the optmon students would use the pass-fall as "nothing more than a tool'' to protect their grade point averages. During debate on the stu4ent amendment the amendment itself was amended so the decision dat4~ on pass-fail would be the same as the withdrawal date (four weeks before the 1end of the semester). The faculty approved the student amendment by a substantial margin. The faculty then defeated a Sbndards and Admissions committee proposal to not officially inform instructors as to whether or not a student 1~s taking a course on a pass-fail basis. In other action the faculty approved the addition of English 100 as part of the curriculum. Incoming freshmen who are deficient in writing skills will be required to take Eng 100 before being allowed to enter the regular Eng 101-102 courses, which are required for graduation. The English Department originally proposed the addition of Eng 100 because they said as much as 25% of incoming freslunen are so wanting in writing skills they cannot successfully do college level work. Controversy arose over whether a student should be granted credit for Eng 100. The course wiiJ be remedial in nature and some f41cu1ty members contended that credit should not be allowed for gaining a level of writing competency which the student should have before entering college. The faculty, after much debate, chose to allow the student credit for Eng J 00, but the credit will be used for determination of full-time status only and wiR not be counted towards graduation. In this issue Graduation changes .......... .4 Cardinal looks back ........... 7 Quintessence ............... 1 2 "Rivals" review ............. 14 Deathsedge concludes . ....... 18 Phototmaph by Jcbb llan~ Where are those warm spring days of yesterye•? Deane Petkus enjoy1ed the sunny weather a few years ago, but so far thti spring the gods of the weather haven't smiled upon Belknap campus. l.1 of L yearbook Deja-Vu, arri•v es The 1975 edition of Deja- Vu was released for sale to students yesterday. The cost for U of L students is $2.00 per ropy for the 232 page look at the year's people . and events. Copies are on sale at all campus bookstores and in the lobby of the U.C. Building. Editor Joe Fowler told the Cardinlll that only a limited number have been printed. "Anyone wishing to purchase a copy should do so as soon as possible," he said. He added that anyone who ordered a book in advance should pick up his copy at the table in the U.C. Building. Dejtl- Vu has been in production since August of last year. The final deadline for any material to be included in the coverage ,was late January. ''It's unfortunate that we can't cover anything that goes on after January but that's just how it has to be in order to get the book back in April," Fowler said. "This year, however, we're doing a supplement so we can -cover the NCAA basketball tournament." "You must · return the enclosed card in order to receive a copy of the supplement," added Mike Kraus, Deja- Vu business manager. "It wil1 be mailed out sometime in June." This is the second year that the yearbook has been called Deja- Vu. Before 1973, it was known as the Thoroughbred Due to internal staff problems, no book was published in 1973. Last year' therefore, with the book back in production, it was felt that a change of name would help the new yearbook establish its identity. Both the 1974 and 1975 editions of Deja- Vu provide sections 0111 groups and seniors, and in format arc similar to the classic yearbook style. This is in contrast to the recent magazine-type product that was attempted here in 1970 :and J 971 but was not well received. M~odcrn design techniques and, according to Fowler, · "very fine photography" giv·c ·the book a contemporary Joo k. "We've tried to include as many people and events throughout the year as possible," Fowler stated. "We feel we've improved over the 1974 bqok and hope next year's can be even bc~tter. I think that ten years from now:, a graduate should be able to pick up this book and remember what went oo her<~." |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for 19750418 1