Louisville Lawyer
Published by The University of Louisville School of Law
VOL. XIV LOUISVILLE. KY .. WINTER. 1968-69 No. 1
Dan Taylor. Telling it like it is!
Is There Justice
In Our Courts?
by Shirley Small
The pressure for "law and order"
and to obtain constructive, just change
within the orderly processes of govern­ment
raises a question. What per­centage
of the time does the system
created by us humans to dispense
"justice" actually achieve its goal?
In other ~?rds, "is there justice in
our courts?
The layman on the street might be
appalled by even considering such a
thought, so indoctrinated is he to the
American system. However, as doc­tors
often discuss the limitations of
medicine and its practitioners in the
smoke-filled doctors' lounge or coffee
shop after a tired day, so also do
lawyers. But rarely do these com­ments
1 reach the public. How many
times have lawyers left a courtroom
with a feeling that justice was not
done? ( It is a different feeling than
when there were close points of law
and fact and the court could go either
way).
The naive layman may be shaken
to reality by his first experience with
the courts. Led to believe that fairness
would prevail, he is sometimes be­wildered
by the distance between the
goal and the results.
When an appeal to the Court of
Appeals is dismissed because of a
technicality in the procedure for fil­ing
the appeal, when a Circuit Court
decision is delayed past the point
where time is of the essence, or when
"summary justice" is rendered, the
results can fall short of the goal.
"Summary justice" is a practice of
listening to arguments for specific
points of law and proof thereon and
not rendering a decision on each, but
merely giving an unexplained judg­ment
of a certain amount. Such a pro­cedure
eliminates ruling specifically
on the issues and where one of the
issues might be sufficient to bind the
entire case - this disappears behind
the smoke screen of confusion.
Holding up a divorce until attorney's
fees are paid is a questionable prac­tice.
Filing away a criminal suit that
should be dismissed, to protect the
police, raises question. The need. for a
uniform court system, lessening court
costs, and reducing technical pro­cedures
is present.
Are the lower courts impatient with
considering new rapidly - developing
theories of law in their desire to cover
the docket? Will a judge who prac­ticed
in a particular field objectively
examine a new theory proposed by
his former opponents? A day-to-day
procedure of making certain each side
has a full opportunity to present his
case, without interruption or harass­ment
by the other attorney, would
help eliminate any procedure by
which the attorney who yells longer
and louder wins.
There are probably others, with
more experience, who could provide
better examples of the question being
raised here.
Often lawyers salve each other by
saying, "you lose some you should
have won, but you win some you
should have lost - it all evens out."
But does it - from the client's point
of view?
Civil Libertarian No. 1
Don Taylor: Maverick
Sitting behind his desk, Daniel T. Taylor III motioned his hand in the
air, saying "Sure it goes on . .. I'd be less than honest if I said it didn't."
Taylor was talking about "fixing" and "favorism", and his hand was ges­turing
toward the Jefferson County Courthouse, barely visible across the
street through the grimy office window.
The 40-year-old criminal lawyer and actions which may diff e r
quickly added that such practices are from civil law. Taylor believes it is
not peculiar to Louisville, or even a higher ethic which may at times
Kentucky. But he finds their very motivate what some call "extreme"
existance anathema, and p e r h a p s behavior on his part. Mr. Taylor be­symptomatic
of what is wrong with lieves that the interest of client and
the practice of law today. He believes the honesty of what you are doing
that too many lawyers make financial should be the sole guide.
gain their overriding objective, rather
than the performance of some service
to society.
A 1954 graduate of the University
of Louisville School of Law, Taylor
has been in the practice of crimtnat·
law for 14 years, save for a few
months spent with a tax firm just
after graduation. In that time, he has
acquired an image that might be
compared to that of F. Lee Bailey:
both are young, flamboyant, and giv­en
to defending well-publicized mur­der
cases. Yet among his colleagues in
the law, with whom his relationship
has at times been stormy, Taylor is
regarded as an intellect and a maver­ick.
Indeed, he himself says that he
has a reputation for "bucking the
establishment." He cancelled his mem­bership
in the Louisville Bar Associa­tion
some time ago in protest over
some of its policies. Yet in 1965, Taylor
was named an "Outstanding Kentuck­ian"
by the Louisville Defender news­paper,
largely for his long-time work
with the American Civil Liberties
Union here.
Not surprisingly, Taylor is mther
outspoken in his views of his profes­sion.
He feels that the public image
of the criminal lawyer is a poor one,
and some members of the bar are to
blame.
Taylor sees the role of the criminal
lawyer as necessarily involved in di­rect
conflict with the accepted forms
of authority. Hence, the criminal law­yer
is, in effect, at odds with society
in defending his client. Further, Tay­lor
finds in many persons an absolute
inability to separate the lawyer from
the charge against his client. As a
result, the criminal lawyer is often
seen in a poor light.
The attitude of some civil lawyers
does nothing to help this. According
to Taylor, some of them tend to look
down on criminal lawyers. Taylor at­tributes
this to an envy of the trial
experience, the responsibility, and
the vital stakes involved in a criminal
case. These factors also call for ethics
Taylor thinks the criminal lawyer
is vital to our society. He says that
we seem to be headed toward a
"garrison state", and that such de­fendei
·s are necessary if civil liberties
are to be maintained.
The recent Supreme Court decisions
have made this, in Taylor's view, a
"golden age in criminal law." Those
who would try to curb their effect he
calls "the nut fringe," but he thinks
the decisions will stand.
The Kentucky Un-American Activ­ities
Committee is one of Taylor's pet
peeves. He calls it unconstitutional
and ham - handed; says it is "Bread
and Circuses" and "seeks to regulate
the free flow of thought and ideas in
the state." The committee is currently
under attack in two law-suits, and
according to Taylor will ultimately be
thrown out.
When questioned about several con­tempt
citations the response was that
"Although I don't take pride in them,
I feel I have to follow what I consider
my duty to client, profession and so­ciety."
Mr. Taylor also noted without
comment that all of the contempt
citations except one were issued by
the same two men who happen to
office together.
Taylor finds criminal law stimulat­ing
and exciting. An individual who
is socially concerned, he feels that he
is making some contribution to society
by his activities. To be alive, he says,
is to practice law, especially criminal
law because "that's where the action's
at".
Yet Taylor thinks most law students
do not share his feelings. He feels
most are establishment-oriented, and
interested in financial success above
all. But, according to Taylor, a stu­dent
who hopes for a more viable
society could find the practice of
criminal law rewarding.
(Mr. Taylor is obviously a maverick
to the end. He was recently involved.
in a controversy with the Kentucky
Bar Assn. over some of his alleged
unethical practices.)
Two THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
The Dean's Corner
by James R. Merritt
During the recent political campaign a good deal of discourse
concerned "Law and Order." Crime statistics of many kinds were
bandied about with varying degrees of expertise and relied upon to
justify an astonishing assortment of conclusions. But there was one
area of almost universal agreement and that was that "law and or­der"
is a matter of serious concern to the American people. Perhaps
law students-and law schools-should ask themselves if they have
any special or peculiar interest in the problem beyond that of other
citizens of good will.
If there is any dominant methodology in legal education it is
that students ask at least three questions about any problem: (1)
what are the facts? (2) how have similar problems been handled in
the past? and ( 3) is there a better way available now?
An orthodox law student would inquire whether the American
people really are more lawless nowadays than in yesteryear. He
would adjust the statistics to allow for better reporting and con­sider
such factors as the shift from a rural to an urban population
and the increasing number and proportions of young people in our
population. ( Regretably crime is essentially the business of the
young; octogenarians seldom commit either rape or bank robberies. )
Futhermore the law student who has been really indoctrinated with
"fact skepticism" would probably ask whether many of the people
who cry out the loudest in favor of law and order might not drive
after drinking or disregard the traffic laws-and think nothing of it­at
least as long as they believe the evasion will not be detected.
Once the extent of our present lawlessness has been identified the
law student would pass on to matters of "precedent."
Have Americans ever been lawless before? Perhaps we should
not ferget that this nation was conceived in a- nw-Glution, fought a
bloody civil war over a revolt, seized the lands of the Indians and
hunted them into near extinction. During the period of the great
westward expansion the frontier was hardly a pattern of lawful
propriety. Moving ahead in time, the prohibition era could not
qualify as a model for the acceptance of the rule of law by large
portions of the population.
Our past handling of lawlessness has not been entirely effective.
Firing on the rebels at the Boston Tea Party and again at Concord
seems not to have turned the trick. The revolt of the Southern
states was put down at the cost of a bloody war. Although less
sanguine, the conduct of the American people during prohibition
does not establish desirable guidelines to be copied now. Assuming
these past solutions do not commend themselves to us as a matter
of stare decisis, are there better ways available? Surely there must
be.
Projections of the future population, economic growth, and
technological advance in this country startle even the cognoscenti.
Guesses of how big this country will be in 1980 vary widely but
seem to be in agreement that, if the country is here at all, it will be
vastly bigger with 250 million people, 45% of whom will be under
21. At the same time, there will be further decline of the farm
population and a doubling of the gross national product. Against
this background a law student might be tempted to inquire whether
questions of "law and order" are not really manifestations of more
searching issues concerning the fate of a changing America.
In spite of the call for "law and order" there is little indication
of any overwhelming willingness to pay the higher taxes which
would be required to pay for more and better trained policemen, a
better judicial system, more effective penal and parole systems, or
even better law schools, nevertheless, the future seems to promise
that the uses of law, difficult as they are to explain or define, will
increase. There will be challenging times ahead for lawyers and
students. Many present law students will have significant roles in
hammering out answers to the "law and order" issue. Let us hope
that they learn their lessons well.
Published by tl1e University of Louisville School of Law Student Bar As­sociation
twice a year for School of Law students, faculty, and alumni.
This issue is mailed to the Louisville Bar Association members.
Editor-in-Chief .. ............................... ............................... Robert P. Benson, ]r.
Assistant Editor ...................................................................... Thomas L. Hogan
Placement Editor ...................... ............... ............................... David Armstmng
Circulation Manager ............................................................. .Leonm·d Selensker
Reporters .............................................. Charles Simpson III, Forrest Lanning
Faculty Advisor .................................................................... W. Scott Thompson
Discrimination Outlawed
by Galen Martin
Under the leadership of Governor
Bert T. Combs, the 1960 Kentucky
General Assembly created the Com­mission
on Human Rights and direct­ed
it to recommend ways to eliminate
injustices caused by discrimination.
During the first five years of its
existence the Commission relied solely
on education methods to eliminate
discrimination. During this period,
the Commission received individual
complaints alleging discrimination, but
had to rely on persuasion to settle the
matter.
After the passage of the Federal
Civil Rights Act of 1964 we felt that
it was imperative that the 1966 Ken­tucky
General Assembly enact en­forcible
public accommodations and
employment law. The General As­sembly
responded to the times and
the Kentucky Civil Rights Act was
enacted in January, 1966 and became
effective on July 1, 1966. The Act
meets the requirements of the 1964
Federal Act and it is our firm belief
that our State law provides more sen­sitive,
more effi cient, and less remote
enforcement procedures than the fed­eral
law. By passing this Act, the
General Assembly showed that Ken­tucky
believes in the handling of state
problems by a State agency rather
than letting Washington handle our
problems for us. This was clearly an
exercise of States Rights in the best
sense of the word-that is the State
did exercise its right to protect the
rights of its ci tizens to be free from
discrimination. Discriminaton is clear­ly
a matter of state concern because
it involves an individual's dignity and
his right to be free of humiliation.
Discrimination deprives a state of
the full productive capacity of indi­viduals:
it encourages civil strife and
unrest; it threatens democratic insti­tutions
and damages the interest, rights
and privileges of all persons within the
state.
" Guaranteed Equality"
As most of you know, the purpose
of the act is to guarantee to all per­sons
in Kentucky freedom from dis­crimination
because of race, color, re­ligion
and national origin in connection
with employment and places of public
accommodations. In 1968 the General
Assembly enacted the fair housing law
which guarantees freedom from dis-crimination
in connection with the
rental or sale of real property.
But you may not be as well aware
of the law's coverage or the procedures
used for enforcement of the law.
These should be of particular concern
to lawyers.
Procedure Outlined
What does a person do when he be­lieves
that he has been discriminated
against in violation of the Kentucky
Civil Rights Act? He may file with
the Commission a written sworn com­plaint
stating that an unlawful prac­tice
has been committed; setting forth
the. facts upon which th e. complaint is
based and setting forth facts sufficient
to enable the Commission to identify
the persons charged. Forms are pro­vided
upon which the complaint may
be written and the staff may assist
individuals in the preparation of their
complaint.
Investigations Confidential
Upon receiving a complaint, the
Commission staff will conduct an ob­jective,
confidential investigation to
determine if there is probable cause to
believe that unlawful discrimination
has occurred. During this stage the
Commission staff is a ttempting to un­cover
facts and does not take sides.
After the inves tigation, the staff must
determine whether the facts reveal
reason to believe that discrimination
has occurred. If probable cause is
found a mandatory conference, con­<
Ciliation and persuasion procedure
must be followed. The Act and the
Commission's philosphy is to empha­size
education, persuasion, and con­ciliation
in bringing about compliance
with the law. The vast majority of
complaints are settled at the concili­ation
stage.
But if conciliation fails, the Com­mission
will serve written notice,
subpoena witnesses and documents
and hold a hearing. At the hearing
the staff attorney will present the
case for the complainant. It is impor­tant
at this point to understand the
separation b etween the staff and the
Commission's funcion at the hearing.
The staff presents the case for the
complainant while the Commission
(Continued on page 4)
Prof. Read Says:
Efficiency ratings are no longer
enough. Now the young man on the
rise must not only be a can-do man
but also a can-feel-and-relate man.
Law teachers are learning about the
lack - of- sensitivity syndrome from
many directions. Here are two random
shafts recently around at legal edu­cation
:
- Arthur Lewis '.Yood, sociol­ogist
at the University of Con­necticut,
asks how it could be
that his studies reveal that a
criminal lawyer's sensitivity to
the needs of the accused poor
seem to vary inversely with
the amount of the lawyer's ed­ucation.
(A. Wood, Criminal
Lawyer ( 1967 ) )
-Ralph Nader, lawyer-crusa­der
(who spoke at our law
school last year), castigates
his own law school for failing
to cultivate a "sense of injus­tice"
among its students, and
asks why, in the pecking order
of legal studies, is analysis of
tax regulations so high and
analysis of meat inspection
laws so low. (Harvard Law
Record, November 7, 1968)
The quick answer to both questions
Et Alii
IRA L . JOHNSON
404 Lindsay Ct.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Washington & Lee -
Sociology - BA
Age: 24- Married
Preference: General
Activities : S.B.A.
WILLIAM D. JONES
306 Highway 31
Speed, Ind.
College: Univ. of Ky. - Mech.
Engr. BS
Age: 29 - Married
Preference: Corporate
Activities : Book Awards;
Pleading & Const. Law;
Dean's List.
LEIF JORGENSON
200 North HUe Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Michigan -
History- AB
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: Teaching
Activities: Bail Project, Di-rector;
Book Awards; Dean's
List; Phi Kappa Phi Hon­orary
Society.
DAVID J . LEIBSON
4213 Norbourne Blvd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Vanderbilt Univ. -
Political Sci. - BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Moot Ct.; Book
Awards; Contracts, Wills,
Property; Dean's List; Phi
Kappa Phi Honorary So­ciety.
MAX C. MASON
1206 Korb Ave.
New Alabny, Ind.
College: U. of L. - Economics
- BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities : Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Assoc. Editor; Moot Ct.
Judge; S.B.A.; Dean's List.
TERENCE LEE MOORE
3106 Dell Brooke Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U of L. - Accounting
- BSL
Age: 27 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Book Award; eq-ity;
Dean's List.
THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
is, of course: Money.
But money is not the whole answer.
The hardening process that occurs
when people spend three years at
law school being taught to think like
lawyers" has long been recognized,
and even prized. This leads to my
point: Should a law teacher try to
do something about the callousness
that he seems to impart by his teach­ing?
And if so, what?
Law Teachers Disagree
Not all law teachers agree that they
should try to do anything. Many see
their responsibility as that of tmning
out technically competent people who
can pass the bar examinations of their
choice and then effectively serve those
who can afford to pay them. Students
have been told (at another law school )
that if they want to fret about "in­justice"
they belong in divinity
school.
There appear to be, however, a
growing number of law teachers (and
students) who, while not knocking
technical skills, feel that the law
schools need a different set of priori­ties,
curricular and otherwise. They
argue that the expertise now offered
about taxes, corporations, and es tate
QUINN F . PEARL JR.
2611 Brookside Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U.S. Military Acade-my-
BS
Age: 31 - Married
Preference: None
Activities: Delta Theta Phi
ARTHUR C. PETER
401 Mayfair Ln.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Va. - His-tory
- BA
Age: 25 - Single
Preference: None
Activities: PAD; SBA.
HERBERT P. PRICE
3336 Dean Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Chemistry
- MS
Age: 45- Married
Preference: Patents
Activities: Moot Ct.; S.B.A .;
Dean's List
ELOISE L. RIPPlE
1226 Summit Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Ky. - Vo­cational
Home Economics -
BS; Iowa State Unlv. -
Household Equipment - MS
Preference: Open
Activities. Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Assoc. Editor; Kappa Beta
Pi, secretary; Moot Ct.;
S.B.A.; Phi Upsilon Omi­ron.
DAVID N . SCHROER JR.
llSO Eastern Pkwy.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L . - Pol. Sci. -
BA
Age: 23 - Married
Preference: Trail Practice
Activities: Moot Ct.; Louis-ville
Lawyer, reporter ;
S.B.A.
HUGH D. SKEES
1701 S. 4th St.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Pol Sci. -
BA
Age: 29 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Developments Editor; Moot
Court Judge; Law Clerk.
JOHN MICHAEL SKELTON
323 Idlewylde Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Yale Univ. - History,
English- BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: SBA
planning, for example, should be
matched by expertise relevant to actu­al,
as distinguished from just paying,
problems. They would say that we
need major (even bar) courses in
such areas as poverty, pollution, and
urban planning.
Quo Vadis?
Which way ·are we going at Louis­ville?
While by and large we are
standing pat, we are making some
modest effor ts to combat callousness.
Recent curriculum changes have at­tempted
slight increases in public law
offerings. This year's seminars include
Juvenile Problems, Poverty and the
Law, Legal Counseling, Criminal Law
Problems, and Violence and Law.
In addition to publication of the
Journal of Family Law, which keeps
about 25 students involved with large­ly
humanistic problems, the law school
has mid-wived activities which have
given or are giving students service
opportunities, such as: assisting with
a project to lighten the bail burdens of
accused persons; working for the
Kentucky Civil Liberties Union, main­ly
interviewing inmates of Kentucky
prisons who claim they did not get
fair trials; and assisting the public
Moot Court
More students will par ticipate in
some facet of Moot Comt this year
than in any year in the history of the
law school. Next semester arguments,
which includes the. Night Law School,
will total over one-hundred and fifty
oral advocates. In order to meet the
administrative needs, an Executive
Committee has been formed which
oversees the program.
The executive commitee system pro­duced
a practically flawless program
for the freshman first semester. The
system enabled the freshman to dis­pense
with their semester requirement
at an unprecedented early date of
November 11, 1968.
The moot court year began with
choosi ng two students to represent
the school in the National Moot Court
Tournament which is sponsored by
tl1e New York Bar Association. His­tory
was made this year when the
four finalists of our local competition,
Grover Potts, Richard Barlow, James
Milliman, and John McCord, appeared
before the Commonwealth's highest
court, the Court of Appeals. Barlow
and McCord were chosen to represent
the school in the Regional Tournament
in Knoxville, Tenn. After beating Val­pariso
University, the University of
Louisville Moot Court team los t to
Vanderbilt University, the eventual
regional victor. The representation of
Barlow and McCord was more than
meritorious, and the answer to every
Kentucky lawyer's dream, to appear
before the Court of Appeals, added
great impetus to the moot court pro­gram.
THREE
schools in teaching high school stu­dents
about individual constitutional
rights.
Perhaps more pertinent to the cal­lousness
question at this stage than
either curriculum or activities is the
way students read, in and out of the
class room, a teacher's own attitudes
and concerns . Data is lacking as to
how we stand here.
We probably do not have at Louis­ville
the resources, financial or in­tellectual,
to develop a Poverty Law
casebook comparable to Baker and
Cary on Corporations. For this we
may have to wait for the larger, more
affl uent law schools to do the pio­neering.
But we do have some things
going for us that they do not have.
We are the only urban law school in
Kentucky and we are in an urban
setting at a stage of development
where its problems are still manage­able.
'"'e have unusually open, com­municative
relations among our stu­dents,
between our students and our
faculty and among students, faculty
and administra tion. And not many of
our students are likely to be lured to
Wall Street, even if the prices go still
higher.
"!'lawless''
As m en t i on e d previously, the
first semester freshman competition
went practically flawlessly. The prob­lem
areas centered around misuse of
library facilities and lack of preparation
on the part of the judges. The day
after the last argument, the Moot Court
Executive Committee met to revamp
th e entire program, keeping intact the
assets and hopefully eliminating the
minuses for next semester's competi­tion.
Next semester will be tournament
style with two men per argument ad­vancing
to the next round. There will
be a pre-trial conference implemented
to assist in ascertaining the issues to
be 1·esolved. A member of the execu­tive
committee will be on each p anel
to assist in policy matters. There will
be a separate program for the night
school, in order to stagger the use of
library.
Night School has Problems
The night school will also have
a different problem. In total, next
semester will have two problems, over
one-hundred and fifty oral advocates,
between sixty and seventy judges re­quired,
and ·about eight weeks to ad­ministrate.
The Executive Committee
is also sponsoring the annual Law Day
program May 1, 1969. In essence, next
semester entails much work in order to
carry out the initial philosophy of the
Committee: to provide the finest pro­gram
possible for those involved in
Moot Court.
FoUR THE LouiSVILLE LAWYER
Discrimination PADS DELTS
Oullawed
(Continued from page 2) and other war stories
members hear the evidence and make
a finding of fact and law. Also if a
Commissioner has been involved in
the investigative process he cannot
hear and decide on a case at the
hearing. This separation of the in­vestigation
and hearing functions of
the Commission is one method of as­sming
the fairness of the procedme.
Commission Decides
If after hearing the evidence from
both parties the Commission deter­mines
that the respondent has not en­gaged
in an unlawful practice, the
Commission shall issue an order dis­missing
the complaint. But if the
Commission determines that the re­spondent
has engaged in an unlawful
practice the Commission shall state
its findings of fact and conclusions of
law and shall issue an order requiring
the respondent to cease and desist
from the unlawful practice and to
take such affirmative action as is the
judgment of the Commission will car­ry
out the purposes of the Act.
A complaint or respondent ag­grieved
by an order of the Commission
may obtain judicial review of the
Commission's order. The proceeding
for review is in circuit court and the
decision of the circuit is appealable to
the Court of Appeals.
The Vinson Chapter of Phi Alpha
Delta Law Fraternity has been very
active since the present officers were
installed at the end of last spring se­mester.
This newly elected admini­stration
included Harley Blankenship,
Justice; 1 ick Burlew, Vice-Justice; Ed
flopson, Treasmer; Doug Ball, Clerk;
Bob Benson, Marshall; and Steve
Sachs, Reporter.
Our main thoughts, at this time,
foc used upon rush and the Fraternity's
main objectives which involve "ser­vice
to the Student, the Law School,
and the Profession". PAD had remain­ed
the leading fraternity at U. of L.
Law School through carrying out these
goals, and it was our intention to re­main
such a leader.
Harley Goes Bye-Bye
On October 14, some unfortunate
luck came upon Vinson Chapter
when the U.S. Army Reserves bid for
the services of Justice Blankenship
for basic training. Brother Blankenship
was unavailable for five months and
so the vacancy in the office of Justice
had to be filled. Brother Nick Burlew
then moved up from Vice-Justice to
replace Harley, and Brother John
Paddock was appointed as Vice­Justice
to replace Nick.
Bailey, spoke to an enthusias tic group
of students, Faculty, and Alumni. Dis­tinguished
gues ts included former
Congressman Frank Burke, Assistant
Dean of U. L. Law School, Scott
Thomson, and Henry Triplett, Justice
of PAD Ahmmi Chapter.
Schuster sans Gilbert
On December 4, PAD once again
provided a service to the school and
student by presenting a program des­ignated
to aiel freshmen for final
exams.
Brother Steve Schuster, Editor in
Chief of Journal of Family Law, de­liberated
on "Helpful Hints in Prep­aration
for Law School Exams". Many
freshmen have expressed anxiety to­ward
these semester finals, and it was
Vinson Chapter's desi re to help as
much as possible.
On December 8, Vinson Chapter
once again competed in a basketball
game with Delta Theta Phi, U. of L.'s
other legal fraternity. Last year the
match was fi erce; we lost by one
point, and we almost lost Brother
Brockman, who twisted his ankle
while in the act of battling for a re­bound.
Revenge Is Sweet
Also the Commission may obtain an
order of the court for enforcement of
its order. Of course, this judgment or
decree is -also appealable to the Court
of Appeals.
As Moot Court wa" fast approach- - Ihe.---outco.me thi~ year, how.ever,
incr PAD decided to present a pro- was an entirely dtfferent story; a
gr~~l to orient the freshmen with re- story ?~ revenge. It was a contest of
gards to problems of and preparation durabthty and talent, and the Delts
for the up-coming grind. w_ere overwhelm~d by an awesome
dtsplay of offenstve power, rebound­ing
strength, and blinding speed. The
Vinson cagers utilized a continuous
fast break which enabled the Brothers
to score at will. Lord Leads
Lady Lawyers
Recently reactivated Rho Chapter of
Kappa Beta Pi legal sorority plans to
highlight their busy social season with
a Christmas luncheon at the home of
Dean Evelyn Lord on a December
Saturday. This follows on the heels
of a sherry party in November and a
luncheon at the Olde House as guests
of the Louisville Women Lawyers
Association.
Newly elected officers of the sorority
include Mrs. Lord, Eloise Rippie as
Scivener -and Wandaleen Poynter as
Chancellor. Martha Jean Schecter is
the outstanding member, as deter­mined
by a recent poll of Phi Alpha
Delta & Delta Theta Phi.
The sorority is currently rushing an
exceptional freshman class and looks
forward to a substantial increase in
membership next semester.
Vinson Alu1nni and former Justice,
Brother Don Heavrin, spoke to the
freshmen concerning their dilemma.
The program was entitled "How to
Prepare for :!\'loot Court", and Brother
Heavrin graciously allowed Vinson
Chapter to have his revised 12-page
edition, "How to Prepare for Moot
Court," printed for each freshman.
Brother Heavrin spent quite some
time preparing for this function , and
95% of the freshman turned out for
the annual event. Hopefully, Brother
Don will be available next year.
Distinguished Guest
Our latest monthly dinner meeting
was held at the Medical Arts Building.
Steak was on the menu, and dinner
was preceded by a cocktail hour.
Vinson Chapter was fortunate in
being honored with the presence of
one of the country's truly great crim­inal
lawyers. Henry B. Rothblatt, a
member of New York and California
Bar Associations and who has written
several books, one of which was com­piled
as a co-author with F . Lee
THE LOUISVILLE LAWYER
University of Louisville
School of Law
2301 South 3rd Street
LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40208
FORM 3547 REQUESTED
The final score was PAD 63, Delts
35, and those Brothers that contributed
their talents to outclass and overpower
the Delts included: John (super star)
Paddock, Ken Conliffe, Nick Burlew,
Bucky Lanning, Dave Scott, Paul Viss­man,
Ed Hopson, Glen Shelton, Tracy
Schmidt, Geson Weisburg, and Mike
Skelton.
These events are past history, and
even though the semester is about to
end, Vinson Chapter has not, by any
means, shut down its operations.
This semester has involved a tre­mendous
amount of effort on the part
of the Brothers, Alumni, and Pledges.
This fall has been the most active that
Vinson Chapter has ever enjoyed, and
this was only accomplished by team­work.
The grind is not completed as
of yet; there still remans the spring
semester, and PAD, by no means, in­tends
to live clown its reputation as
being where the "action" is.
The broth ers of Henry Clay Senate
were very proud and pleased to leam
of the "Outstanding Senate Award",
which we received in October. This
award was given by the Supreme
Senate of Delta Theta Phi for out­standing
professional and fraternal
programs during 1967-1968. This
award climaxed a year of hard work
for the brothers of this senate, and it
has given us new vigor to work toward
receiving th e award again this year.
As we returned from a most pro­ductive
summer, Clay Senate im­mediately
began a most enthusiastic
rush program. Formal Rush was in­itiated
on September 1, when the
Senate held its first cocktail party. The
motif was Southern Comfort, giving
the active members a chance to offer
the fr eshman rushees some old fashion
hospitality. This event was shortly
followed by the Saturday afternoon
football party, where the members and
rushees took time off to watch the
Purdue - Norte Dame game and drink
a little beer. In October the rushees
and their elates were invited to attend
the Delt Wives Auxilliary "Halloween­Costume
Party."
The highlight of the Senate's rush
program was the October 18th rush
banquet, held this year ·at Stouffer's
Louisvill Inn. Later in the evening-­the
senate was awarded the "Out­standing
Student Senate Award of
Region 7", by Mr. James B. Lenihan,
regional coordinator of Delta Theta
Phi.
The fall rush program was success­fully
completed with the Alumni -
Active Homecoming Cocktail Party,
held at the Standiford Motor Lodge.
Some 27 alumni and wives were pres­ent
along with members of tl1e faculty
and members of the active senate.
The senate is presently engaged in ,
soliciting help from the practicing
alumni in conducting an annual clinic
open to the student body at which
demonstrations in the art of cross ex­aminations,
taking depositions, law
office organization and management,
etc., will provide practical guides to
the student whose predominant ap­proach
has been the-oretical. Sponsor­ship
of a private bar review program
are among the proposed expansion of
activities.
In athletics, the senate has organized.
an intramural basketball team to par­ticipate
in the graduate school league.
Members of last year's victorious Delt
Basketball team are again looking for­ward
to renewing the victory over tl1e
P.A.D.s in the forthcoming Delt-Pad
Basketball Game.
Non-Profit Org.
U. S. POSTAGE
PAID
LOUISVILLE, KY.
Permit No. 435
JOHN P. ABELL
4409 W. Broadway
Louisville, Ky.
College: St. Meinrad - History
-B.A.
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: General Practice
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Moot Ct .. K.C.L.U.
EDWARD C. AIRHART
3409 Fountain Dr.
Louisville. Ky.
College: Ohio University
Mechanical Engineering
BSME
Age: 26 - Single
Preference: Patent or General
Activities: Delta Theta Phi,
Moot Ct .. S.B.A.
BART BASI
2542 Ridgewood Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Utica, B.S. - Syra-cuse,
M.B.A.
Age: 29 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: S.B.A.; Dean's List
C. MICHAEL BUDLONG
1617 Pershing Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Conn.
Political Science - BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Phi Alpha ~Delta;
Moot Ct. Judge.
The Louisville Lawyer
Presents Promising
Graduates For 1969
JONATHAN ALPERT
2724 Brownsboro Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Indiana Univ. - B.A.
Age: 25 - Married
Preference: General or Fed.
Agency
Activities: S.B.A.. Moot Ct.
ROBERT P. BENSON. JR.
2621 Drayton Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Bellarmine - Socio-logy-
A.B.
Age: 26 - Single
Preference: Trial Practice
Activities: Louisville Lawyer,
Editor In Chief; Student
Bar Newsletter; Editor In
Chief; Phi Alpha :Delta.
Marshall; S.B.A.. Faculty
Relations Committee; Moot
Ct.. Judge; Young Demo­crats.
NICK BURLEW
2601 Valletta Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Southern Methodist -
Business - BA
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Phi Alpha Delta,
Justice; S.B.A.; Moot Ct.
Judge.
HENRY J. ANTONINI
Box 804
Univ. of Louisville
Louisville. Ky.
College: U. of L.
Age: 40 - Married
Preference: General Practice
Activities: S.B.A.
HUGH H. BERNSTEIN
2363 Saratoga Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Vermont -
Political Science - B.A.
Age: 24 - Single
Preferred: Tort Practice
Activities: S.B.A.. Chairman-
Faculty-Rei. Comm.; Bail
Project; Legal Aid; Ky.
Civil Liberties Union.
JOHN K. CARTER
5703 Jeanine Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Kentucky Southern -
English - BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A.
DAVID L. ARMSTRONG
2000 Confederate Pl.
Louisville. Ky.
College: Murray State Univ. ­Business
Adm. - B.S.
~i.:'t'er2:n.;e:Ma{~~~- Law or
General Practice
Activities: Delta Theta Phi -
Dean; Moot Ct. Judge; Lou­isville
Lawyer, Placement
Editor, Associate Editor;
S.B.A., Executive Comm ..
Chairman-Bldg. Com m. ;
Student Senate, Chairman­S
t u d e n t Affairs Comm.,
Parking Comm.; Librarian
Assistantship (2 yrs.); ABA
- Law Student Division.
RICHARD W. BERRY
7301 Preston Hwy.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Iowa
Speech & Dramatic Arts -
BA
Age: 32 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Moot Ct. Judge.
MITCHELL A. CHARNEY
2363 Saratoga Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Pol. Sci. -
BA
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: Tort, General
Activities: S .B.A.; Bail Pro-ject;
Legal Aid Society;
K.C.L.U.
DOUGLASV. ACKERMAN
2034 Tyler Lane
Louisville, Kentucky
College: Davidson - History -
B.A.
Age: 28 - Single
Preference: General Practice
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
S.B.A., Honor C o u n c i I ,
Placement Comm., Librar­ian
Assistantship, Who's
Who in American Colleges
and Univ.
RICHARD BARLOW
1801 So. 3rd
Louisville, Ky.
College: Duke - BA
Age: 25 - Single
Preference: General
Activities: National Moot Ct.
Team; Vice-Pres .. Moot Ct.
Club; Delta Theta Phi;
S.B.A.
EDWARD J . BROCKMAN JR.
500 Kenwood Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Louisville -
Sociology - B.S.
Age: 23 -Married
Preference General Practice
Activities: Phi Alpha Delta,
Vice-Justice; M o o ! C ! •
Judge; S.B.A.; Summer Pro­gram
in Law, Univ. of
Exeter, Exeter England.
NORMAN CHIDIAC
3806 Southern Pkwy.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Seton Hall - Sec-ondary
Educ. - B.S.
Age: 30- Married
Preference: General
Activities: S.B.A.; Moo! Ct.
Judge.
H . PAUL HAYNES
Box 943 Univ. of Louisville
Louisville, Ky.
College: Transylvania College
- History & Economics -
BA
Age: 27 - Single
Preferred: General Practice
or Corporations
Activities : Phi Alpha Delta,
Justice; Moot Ct. Judge,
National; Louisville Lawyer,
r e p o r t e r : S.B.A.. Exec.
Comm. ODK; Dean's List;
PAD Scholarship; Moot Ct.
Club, pres.; Univ. Judicial
Bd.; Summer Intern, At­torney
Generals Office.
GEORGE FLESHMAN
8511 Bayou Way
Louisville, Ky.
College: Marshall Univ.
Geology- BA
Age: 35 -Married
Preference: General
Activities: Delta Theta Phi;
Moot Ct. Judge; S.B.A.
BYRON GROVES
Box 935
Univ. of Louisville
Louisville, Ky.
College: U . of L . - Law -J.D.
Age: 26 - Single
Preference: General or Cor­porate
Activities: PAD; S.B.A.; Book
Awards; Domestic Relations;
Dean's List; Who's Who
Among American Colleges
& Univ.
RICHARD B. CONGER
6808 Green Meadow Circle
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of Ky. - BA
Age: 29 - Married
Preference: General Practice
Activities : Delta Theta Phi;
S.B.A.
JOSEPH COSTELLO
2000 Confederate Pl.
Louisville. Ky.
College: Steubenville - His-tory
- BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities : Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A. ; Librarian Assistant­ship.
J. CHASE FORRESTER
2731 Brownsboro Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
Colleqe: U. of L. - Business -
BSC
Age: 26 -Married
Preference: General
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law.
Assoc. Editor : P .A.D.;
S.B.A .. Social Comm.; Book
Award; Property I; Moot
Ct.
GEORGE N. GUEST
8506 Bayou Way
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Georgia -
Journalism - ABJ
Age: 24 - Married
Activities: Delta Theta Phi;
Moot Ct. Club; S.B.A.; Moot
Ct. Judge; Ben F . Washer
Memorial Award.
HARRY K. HERREN JR.
2464 Grinstead Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Union College - Bio-logy
- BA
Age: 25 - Married
Preference: None
Activities: Phi Alpha Delta;
SBA.
WILLIAM C. D'AMICO
2501 Lindsay Ave.
Louisville. Ky.
College: Purdue - Pharmacy -
BS
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: Patent or General
Practice
Activities: Delta Theta Phi;
Moot Ct. Judge; S.B.A ..
Exec. Comm.
STEPHEN N. FRAZIER
5115 Feys Court
Louisville, Ky.
College: Pikevllle - Education
- BA
Age: 25 - Married
Preference: Tort - Labor Law
Activities: S.B.A.. Member -
ship Comm.; Book Award;
Equity; Moot Ct. Judge.
MICHAEL N. HARRELD
2409 Westwood Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Pol. Sci. -
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: Estate Planning,
General Practice
Activities: Phi Alpha Delta;
S.B.A.
EDWIN S. HOPSON
2201 Cherokee Pwy.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Arts -
Law- BSL
Age: 23 - Married
Preference: General
Activities : Phi Alpha Delta,
Treasurer; Moot Ct.; S.B.A ..
Chairman - P 1 a c e m e n I
Comm.; Intramurals.
WILLIAM R. DeMOSS
3104 Dellbrooke Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Ky. Wesleyan Col-lege
- Math - BS
Age: 28 - Single
Preference: General
Activities: S.B.A. ; Moot Ct.
Club, V-Pres. (Night)
MYRON FUHRMANN
1252 Willow Ave.
Louis·ville, Ky.
College: Rutgers Univ. - Eco-nomics
- AB
Age: 25 - Sinqle
Preference: Tax
Activ ities: Phi Alpha De lta;
Moot Ct. S.B.A.
JOHN WILLAMS HAY
507 Belgravia Ct.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of the South -
English - BA
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: Open
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Assoc. Editor; Book Award;
Criminal Law.
HAROLD E. DILLMAN
3128 Eagle Pass
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of Louisville - BSC
Age: 34 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: S,B,A,; Moot Ct.
ALAN J . FARBER
2119 Lowell Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Louisville -
Pol. Sci. - BSL
Age: 25 - Single
Preference: Teaching
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Delta Tthta Phi, Tribune;
Moot Ct., Judge; Louisville
Lawyer, reporter; S.B.A ..
Vice-Pres., Faculty - Rel.
Comm.; Book Award; Con­flict
of Laws; Student Sen­ate,
Law representative;
Dean's List; Carl Mann
Scholarship and Brandeis
Scholarship Awards; Brief­ing
Service; Young Demo­crats,
President; Pi Sigma;
Law Students Civil Rights
Comm.
WESLEY G. GATLIN JR.
4112 Stone View Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Business
Mgt. - BSC
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General or Trial
Activities : PAD; Moot Ct.
THOMAS HOGAN
3105 Horton
Louisville, Ky.
College: Bellarmine - Philo-sophy-
BA
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: General. Criminal
Activities: Student Bar News-letter,
Editor: Louisville
Lawyer, Editor; Young De­mocrats;
S.B.A., LEAD; Phi
Alpha Delta.
DAVID K. KAREM
2445 Glenmary Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College : Univ. of Cinn. - De-sign-
BS
Age 25 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: PAD; S.B.A.
WILLIAM E. LANTRIP
3716 Glen Oak Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ of Lou. - BA
Age: 25- Single
Preference: General
Activities : S.B.A.; Moot Ct ..
Delia Theta Phi.
GARY LORENZ
8605 Blossom Ln.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Georgetown - Busi-ness
Adm. - BS
Age: 28
Preference: General Praclice
Activities: Delia Theta Phi,
Intramural Chairman; Moot
Ct.; S.B.A.; Dean's List.
THOMAS P . NICHOLAS II
404 Browns Lane
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Mgt. - BS
Age: 33 - Married
Preference: General, Labor
Law, Corporate
Activities: Delia Theta Phi,
! ocial Chairman, Bailiff;
Moot Ct.; S.B.A.; Moot Ct.
Club, V-pres. (Night).
J . JOHN REDELBERGER JR.
2603 Le Blanc Ct.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Ky. Wesleyan Col-lege
- Business BA
Age: 29 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Delia Theta Phi.
Clerk- of-Rolls; Moot Ct.
S .B.A.
F. WILLIAM LaVIGNE
1640 Cherokee Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Kings College
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: General
Activities : P.A.D.; Moot Ct.
Judge; S.B.A.
CHARLES W. MATHEWS Ill
1287 Bardstown Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L . - Pol. Sci. -
BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: Private Practice
Aclivi!ies: Delia Theta Phi.
Member; Moot Ct.; S.B.A.,
Social Chairman.
JAMES E. PINKOWSKI
310 w. Lee St.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Law - J.D.
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: Corporations
AclivUies: PAD; Moot Ct .
Judge; S .B.A., Membership
Comm.; ABA.
JEFFREY B. REITMAN
2000 Confederate Pl.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Ohio State Univ . -
Labor Economics - BBS
Age: 24- Married
Preference: General with La­bor
Law emphasis
Activities : Moot Ct. Judge;
S .B.A., Bldg. Comm.
JOHN M. LAWRENCE
220 Kennedy Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Bellarmine - History
- BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities : Delia Theta Phi,
Master-of- Ritual; Moot Ct.;
S.B.A.; Dean's List.
JOHN C. McANDREWS
1848 Shaddy Lane
Louisville, Ky.
College: MarqueUe Univ.
Pol. Sci.- BA
Age: 25 - Single
Preference: Labor or Work­man
Comp.
Activities: P .A.D.; Moot Ct.
Judge; S.B.A .; Dean's List.
WALTER L. PORTER
300 Eastern Pkwy.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L.
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: General
Activities : Delia Theta Phi;
Moot Court; S.B.A.; Stu­dent
Senate.
MICHAEL ROSENBLOOM
4816 So. 3rd St.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Tulane Univ. - His -
tory- BA
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: Torts
Activities: PAD; Moot Ct.
Judge; S.B.A.
MICHAEL B. LETT
3201 Leith Lane
Louisville, Ky.
College: Depauw Univ. - Pol.
Sci.- BA
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: General
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Assoc. Editor; Delia Theta
Phi. Master-of-Rolls, Trib­une;
Moot Ct. Judge; S.B.A.
GEORGE ANTHONY MILLS
3919 Woodgate Ln.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Bellarmine - Busi-ness
Adm. - BA
Age: 36 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Delia Theta Phi;
Moot Ct.; S.B .A.
GROVER C. POTTS JR.
941 Keswick Blvd.
Louisville, Ky.
College U. of L. - Business
Mgt. - BSC
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law.
Assist. Editor; Moot Ct.
Club, Vice- Pres.; National
Moot Ct.; S.B.A.; Book
Award; Const. Law; ODK;
L i b r a r i a n Assistantship;
Dean's List; Carl Mann
Award; ABA - Law Stu­M
e m o r i a 1 Scholarship
dent Division.
RALPH H. RUCH JR.
955 Baxter Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Philosophy
- BA
Age: 25 - Single
Preference: Estate Planning
Activities : Moot Ct.; Dean's
List; Honor Council
EVELYN M. LORD
6212 Glen Hill Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Boston Univ. - Ro-mance
Languages - BA
Age: 41 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Adm. Editor: Kappa Beta
Pi. Dean; Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A., Chairman, Convo­cation
Comm.; Dean's List;
Who' Who in American Col­leges
and Universities; Law
Clerk, County AUorney.
JOHN E. MONTGOMERY
5105 Rangeland Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Chemical
Engr. B Ch. E.
Age: 27 - Married
Preference: Corporation
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Articles Editor; Moot Ct.
Judge; S.B.A., President;
Book Awards; Torts I ,
Torts II, Const .Law I; Stu­dent
Senate; ODK; Dean's
Lis t ; Scholarship Award
(Highest cum. average); Phi
Kappa Phi Honorary.
TIPTON REED
1460 St. James Ct.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Vanderbilt - B.A.
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: General
Activities: S.B.A.; Delia The-ta
Phi; Moot Ct.. Judge.
STEPHEN SACHS
Box 357 Univ. of Louisville
Louisville, Ky.
College Ricker College - Bus-iness
- BA
Age: 26 - Single
Preference: General
Activities Phi Alpha Delia,
Reporter; Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A.
DON F. SCHMIDT
9208 Matilda Ct.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Political
Sci. - BA
Age: 24 -Single
Preference: General
Activities: Moot Ct. Judge
RONALD K. SMITH
4811 s. 3rd
Louisville, Ky.
College: Univ. of Miami -
History - BA
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: General
Activities: Moot Ct. Judge;
Delta Theta Phi; Louisville
Lawyer, Circulation Editor;
S.B.A.; ABA Student
member.
GEORGE T. TIERNEY
2000 Confederate Pl.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Rutgers Univ.
American Civilization - AB
Age: 27 - Married
Preference: Gener al
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Assist. Notes Editor; S .B.A.;
Dean's List.
LARRY F. WILHAM
9911 Kenmont Lane
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Mechani­cal
Engr. - BME
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: General or Cor­porate
Aclivitie:s S .B.A.; Moot Ct.;
Dean's List.
DANIEL A. SCHNEIDER
2011 Alta Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Northland College
Age: 24
Preference: General
Activities : Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A.
WALTER J . STEFANSKI
120 E. Barbee St.
Louisville, Ky.
College: -Murray State U·n iv.
- Math & History - BA
Age: 23 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Della Theta Phi,
Vice-Dean; Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A.; Librarian Assistant­sip;
Honor Code Comm.
WARREN W. TIPTON
1709 N. Larkspur Dr.
Jeffersonville, Ind.
College: U. of L.
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: Negligence, Di­vorce
Activities: Della Theta Phi,
R u s h Chairman. Master
Scholar; Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A.. Chairman - Mem-bership
Comm.
FRANKLIN S. YUDKIN
2914 Moran Pl.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Indiana Univ. - His-tory-
AB
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: None
Activities: PAD; Moot Ct.
Judge; K.C.L.U.
STEPHEN F. SCHUSTER
222 Brown Ave.
Louisville. Ky.
College: Catholic Univ. of
America - Psychology - AB
Age: 25
Preference: General
Activities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
Editor-In-Chief; PAD; Moot
Ct.; Honor Code Comm.;
Book Award; Property II;
Dean's List; Scholarship
Award; Outstanding Fresh­man.
JAMES C. STONE III
3609 Brownsboro Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Trinity College
History - BA
Age: 26 - Married
Preference Trial work
Activities: PAD; Moot Ct.
Judge; S.B.A.. Vice-Pres.;
Book Award; Contracts II;
Student Senate; Dean's List.
PAUL R. WALLACE
2018 Bonnycastle Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Pol. Sci. -
AB
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: Tax, Corporate,
General
Activities : Della Theta Phi;
Moot Ct. Judge; Young
Democrats; S .B.A.
TOMMY M. BROWN
331 Idlewylde Dr.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Texas Western
History - BA
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: Tax or Govt.
Agency
Activities: S.B.A., Scholar­ship
Award.
CARLO B. COLEMAN
2025 Brownsboro Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Mars Hill, Univ. of
Ala. - Accounting - B.S.
Age: 24 - Married
Preference: Tax or Corpora­tion
Work
Activities: Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A.; Tax Seminar.
GLEN H. SHELTON JR.
6910 Conn. Drive
Louisville, Ky.
College: Indiana Univ. - Ac­counting
- BS
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: Criminal law or
Tax
Activi ties : PAD; Moot Ct.
Judge; S .B.A.. Placement
Comm.: Librarian Assist­antship.
STEVEN B. STREPEY
2219 Brighton Dr.
Louisvill_e, Ky.
College: Miami of Ohio~ - His-tory
- BS
Age: 27 - Single
Preference: Gen~ral , Criminal
Activities: Bail Project; Book
Award; Land Use Control.
THOMAS L. WEBER
3031 Talisman Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
lColletle: Bellarmine Ac-counting
- AB
Age: 36 -Married
Preference: Private Practice
Activities: Moot Court
ROBB L. SMITH
2000 Confederate Pl.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Sociology
- BS
1\.ge: 24 - Married
Preference: General
1\.ctivities: Jnl. of Fam. Law;
Phi Alpha Delta; Moot Ct.;
S.B.A.. Faculty - Relations
Comm.; Law Clerk.
IRVIN H. STUMLER
2853 Coleen Ct.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Bellarmine College -
Business Adm. AB
Age: 33 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Delta Theta Phi.
Treasurer; Moot Ct.; S.B.A .•
Library Comm.
GARY M. WEISS
1910 S. 3rd
Louisville. Ky.
College: Univ. of Buffalo -
History - BA
1\.ge: 25 - Single
Preference: Trial Work
1\.ctivities: Jnl. of Fam. Law,
PAD; National Moot Ct.;
Moot Ct. Judge; S.B.A.
Convocation Comm.; Book
Award; K.C.L.U.
NOT PICTURED
LAWRENCE B. CRAIG III
1000 Everett Ave.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Washington & Lee -
History- BA
Age: 24 - Single
Preference Corporate & Gen­eral
Activities: S.B.A.; D e a n ' s
List.
JAMES D. CUTLIP
3650 Cane Run Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: Eastern Illinois Univ.
- Econ. & Bus. - BS
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: Labor Law
Activities: Della Theta Phi;
Jnl. of Fam. Law, staff;
Moot Ct.; Book Award, Con.
Law; Dean's List; Legal
Aid Society.
HARRY DIAMOND
1935 Gardiner Ln.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - Business -
BSC
Age: 24 - Single
Preference: General
Activities: Moot Ct. Judge;
S.B.A.; Moot Ct. Club.
LARRY D. HAND
309 N. Marshall
Clarksville, Ind.
College: Univ. of Indiana -
Language Arts - BS
Age: 26 - Married
Preference: General
Activities: Delta Theta Phi;
S.B.A.
JAMES R. HYDEN
2216 Douglass Blvd.
Louisville, Ky.
College: U. of L. - J . D.
Age: 38- Married
Preference: None
Activities: Della Theta Phi;
Moot Ct.; Book Award;
Criminal Law. Agency. Evi­dence,
Wills, Dean's List.